[2021] KEELC 4732 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 4732 (KLR)

The court found that the preliminary objection failed to meet the threshold of raising pure points of law, as the issues of capacity, proprietary interest, and jurisdiction required factual determination and could not be resolved at the preliminary stage. The Further Amended Petition introduced the 2nd to 171st...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 4732 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: The 172 Residents within Lake Bogoria National Reserve and 171 named individuals; Respondent: National Land Commission; Respondent: The Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Lands & Physical Planning; Respondent: The County Secretary, Baringo County Government; Respondent: The County Executive Committee Member Responsible for Matters Relating to Land, Baringo County Government; Respondent: Baringo County Government; Respondent: The Hon. Attorney General; Respondent: Kenya Wildlife Service (formerly Wildlife Conservation & Management Department); Respondent: Ministry of Tourism and Wildlife, (State Department of Wildlife)
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 16 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection Before Hearing of Main Petition
Outcome
preliminary objection dismissed
Judges
SM Kibunja
Legal Topics
Locus Standi, Jurisdiction of Eland Court, Historical Land Injustices, Limitation of Actions, Compulsory Acquisition, Constitutional Petitions
Source Language
en
Land and Property Constitutional Law Locus Standi Jurisdiction of Eland Court Historical Land Injustices Limitation of Actions Compulsory Acquisition Constitutional Petitions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The 172 Residents within Lake Bogoria National Reserve and 171 named individuals

Applicant

National Land Commission

Respondent

The Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Lands & Physical Planning

Respondent

The County Secretary, Baringo County Government

Respondent

The County Executive Committee Member Responsible for Matters Relating to Land, Baringo County Government

Respondent

Baringo County Government

Respondent

The Hon. Attorney General

Respondent

Kenya Wildlife Service (formerly Wildlife Conservation & Management Department)

Respondent

Ministry of Tourism and Wildlife, (State Department of Wildlife)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection Before Hearing of Main Petition

  1. 1 Whether the Petitioners have proprietary interest over the suit land.
  2. 2 Whether the Petitioners have capacity/locus standi to file and prosecute this petition.
  3. 3 Whether the Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the preliminary objection failed to meet the threshold of raising pure points of law, as the issues of capacity, proprietary interest, and jurisdiction required factual determination and could not be resolved at the preliminary stage. The Further Amended Petition introduced the 2nd to 171st Petitioners as individuals suing in their own names, thereby conferring capacity under Article 22 of the Constitution. The court held that the Environment and Land Court has jurisdiction to hear constitutional petitions relating to land and environment, and that the Limitation of Actions Act does not apply to constitutional claims for violation of rights and freedoms. The court...

Court Disposition

preliminary objection dismissed

Orders

  • The 1st Respondent's preliminary objection dated 29th October, 2019 is dismissed.
  • Costs of the preliminary objection shall abide the outcome of the petition.