[2021] KEHC 9376 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 9376 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants failed to comply with its directions to file and serve the substantive Notice of Motion and submissions within the prescribed twenty-one days. As a result, there was no pending matter for determination. The court exercised its discretion to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 9376 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Rev. Simon Ndungu Mungai; Applicant: Pastor Vincent Mungai Ndungu; Respondent: County Government of Kiambu; Respondent: County Finance Officer Kiambu County Government; Respondent: County Secretary Kiambu County Government
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E055 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Ruling on Non Prosecution
Outcome
suit dismissed for non-prosecution
Judges
P Nyamweya
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Mandamus, Dismissal for Non Prosecution
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Judicial Review Mandamus Dismissal for Non Prosecution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rev. Simon Ndungu Mungai

Applicant

Pastor Vincent Mungai Ndungu

Applicant

County Government of Kiambu

Respondent

County Finance Officer Kiambu County Government

Respondent

County Secretary Kiambu County Government

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Ruling on Non Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the applicants complied with the court's directions to file and serve the substantive Notice of Motion and submissions within the stipulated period.
  2. 2 Whether the suit should be dismissed for non-prosecution due to the applicants' non-compliance.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants failed to comply with its directions to file and serve the substantive Notice of Motion and submissions within the prescribed twenty-one days. As a result, there was no pending matter for determination. The court exercised its discretion to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, marking the file as closed, as the applicants' inaction rendered further proceedings untenable.

Court Disposition

suit dismissed for non-prosecution

Orders

  • This suit is dismissed for non-prosecution and the file is marked as closed.
  • The Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division shall send a copy of this ruling to the applicants by electronic mail by close of business on Thursday, 21st January 2021.