[2021] KECA 331 (KLR)

[2021] KECA 331 (KLR)

The court found that the delay in filing the notice of appeal was short and had been satisfactorily explained by the applicant. The applicant acted promptly upon realizing the omission by its previous advocates and engaged new counsel who took immediate steps to regularize the situation. The court was satisfied that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KECA 331 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Revelation Mission Centre; Respondent: African Church of the Holy Spirit
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application E046 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
DK Musinga
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Notice of Appeal, Appeals Process, Delay and Explanation
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Extension of Time Notice of Appeal Appeals Process Delay and Explanation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Revelation Mission Centre

Applicant

African Church of the Holy Spirit

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient reason for the delay in filing the notice of appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent will be prejudiced by the grant of extension of time.
  3. 3 Whether the intended appeal raises arguable issues.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the delay in filing the notice of appeal was short and had been satisfactorily explained by the applicant. The applicant acted promptly upon realizing the omission by its previous advocates and engaged new counsel who took immediate steps to regularize the situation. The court was satisfied that the proposed grounds of appeal were arguable and that the respondent would not suffer undue prejudice if the extension was granted. Consequently, the court exercised its discretion in favor of the applicant and granted leave to file and serve the notice of appeal within 14 days, with the record of appeal to follow within 30 days thereafter. The applicant was ordered to bear...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Leave granted to the applicant to file and serve the notice of appeal within 14 days from the date of the ruling.
  • Applicant to file and serve the record of appeal within 30 days from the date of service of the notice of appeal.