Revival Fellowship International Kenya v Wambua & another (Environment and Land Case E002 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 3403 (KLR) (20 May 2026) (Ruling)

Revival Fellowship International Kenya v Wambua & another (Environment and Land Case E002 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 3403 (KLR) (20 May 2026) (Ruling)

The court held that the contempt motion dated 27/10/2025 could not be heard together with the motion for amendment and joinder because the intended 2nd Defendant, once joined, would have to respond in self-defence to the contempt allegations. The court therefore allowed the joinder and related amendment prayers, but...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEELC 3403 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: REVIVAL FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL KENYA; 1st Defendant: MICHAEL NTHENGE WAMBUA; 2nd Defendant: MOHAMED SAID SHIMASI
Court
Environment and Land Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Case E002 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Interlocutory Ruling on Motions for Injunction, Mandatory Injunction, Joinder, and Contempt
Outcome
Partially allowed
Judges
["FM Njoroge"]
Legal Topics
Temporary Injunction, Mandatory Injunction, Joinder of Parties, Amended Plaint, Service of Pleadings, Self Defence in Contempt Proceedings, Case Management Directions
Source Language
en
Environment and Land Law Civil Procedure Injunctions Contempt of Court Temporary Injunction Mandatory Injunction Joinder of Parties Amended Plaint +3 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

REVIVAL FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL KENYA

Plaintiff

MICHAEL NTHENGE WAMBUA

1st Defendant

MOHAMED SAID SHIMASI

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Interlocutory Ruling on Motions for Injunction, Mandatory Injunction, Joinder, and Contempt

  1. 1 Whether the application for joinder of Mohamed Said Shimasi as 2nd Defendant should be allowed
  2. 2 Whether the amended plaint should be deemed as properly filed
  3. 3 Whether the contempt motion dated 27/10/2025 could be heard together with the amendment and joinder application

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the contempt motion dated 27/10/2025 could not be heard together with the motion for amendment and joinder because the intended 2nd Defendant, once joined, would have to respond in self-defence to the contempt allegations. The court therefore allowed the joinder and related amendment prayers, but deferred the contempt motion for later directions.

Court Disposition

Partially allowed

Orders

  • Prayer Nos. (c), (e), (f) and (g) in the motion dated 15/10/2025 are granted.
  • The amended plaint shall be filed, paid and served within 7 days from the date of the order.