[2018] KEELRC 1150 (KLR)
The court held that it does not have jurisdiction to extend the limitation period for filing suits under section 90 of the Employment Act. The statutory provision is mandatory and does not confer discretion upon the court to enlarge time for instituting employment claims. Consequently, the application for extension...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEELRC 1150 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Rhoda Kyengo; Applicant: Munywoki Mbithi; Applicant: Jedida Wanjiru; Applicant: Robert Kamuru Marero; Applicant: Elisheva Wambui; Applicant: Eleni Ndetto; Applicant: Jeremiah Irungu; Applicant: Samuel Maranga; Applicant: Kavutha Bewesi; Applicant: William Waweru; Applicant: Shem Okelo; Applicant: Delias Mwathiswa & Others; Respondent: House of Manji Ltd; Respondent: Manji Biscuits Ltd
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 98 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- application dismissed for want of jurisdiction
- Judges
- DI Wasike
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Actions, Jurisdiction of Court, Extension of Time
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rhoda Kyengo
Applicant
Munywoki Mbithi
Applicant
Jedida Wanjiru
Applicant
Robert Kamuru Marero
Applicant
Elisheva Wambui
Applicant
Eleni Ndetto
Applicant
Jeremiah Irungu
Applicant
Samuel Maranga
Applicant
Kavutha Bewesi
Applicant
William Waweru
Applicant
Shem Okelo
Applicant
Delias Mwathiswa & Others
Applicant
House of Manji Ltd
Respondent
Manji Biscuits Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to extend time for filing of suits under the Employment Act.
- 2 Whether the application for extension of time should be granted.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that it does not have jurisdiction to extend the limitation period for filing suits under section 90 of the Employment Act. The statutory provision is mandatory and does not confer discretion upon the court to enlarge time for instituting employment claims. Consequently, the application for extension of time was dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
application dismissed for want of jurisdiction
Orders
- The application dated 4th August, 2017 seeking extension of time to file a suit is dismissed.
- No extension of time is granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
MISC APP NO 98 OF 2017
RHODA KYENGO.....................................1ST CLAIMANT
MUNYWOKI MBITHI.............................2ND CLAIMANT
JEDIDA WANJIRU...................................3RD CLAIMANT
ROBERT KAMURU MARERO.............4TH CLAIMANT
ELISHEVA WAMBUI..............................5TH CLAIMANT
ELENI NDETO.........................................6TH CLAIMANT
JEREMIAH IRUNGU..............................7TH CLAIMANT
SAMUEL MARANGA.............................8TH CLAIMANT
KAVUTHA BEWESI................................9TH CLAIMANT
WILLIAM WAWERU............................10TH CLAIMANT
SHEM OKELO........................................11TH CLAIMANT
DELIAS MWATHISWA & OTHERS....12TH CLAIMANT
VERSUS
HOUSE OF MANJI LTD......................1ST RESPONDENT
MANJI BISCUITS LTD.......................2ND RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The court has reviewed and considered the application dated 4th August, 2017 seeking extension of time to file a suit and orders that the same shall be dismissed since under section 90 of the Employment Act, the court lacks jurisdiction to extend time for filing of suits.
2. It is ordered.
Dated at Nairobi this 21st day of September, 2018
Abuodha J. N.
Judge
Delivered at Nairobi this 21st day of September, 2018
Abuodha J. N.
Judge
In the presence of:-
…………………………………for the Claimant
………………………………….for the Respondent.