[2019] KEELC 4306 (KLR)
The court found that, although no actual bias was demonstrated in the present case, the applicants' apprehension of bias was genuine and well-founded due to the pending complaint before the Judicial Service Commission in another matter involving the same judge. The judge emphasized that justice must not only be done...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEELC 4306 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Rhoda Tipis (suing as the legal rep of the estate of Justus Kantet Ole Tipis); Defendant: Lemaria Ole Karia; Defendant: Raphael Patita Parleon; Defendant: Lemele Group Ranch
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Narok
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 530 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Recusal of Judge
- Outcome
- application for recusal allowed; judge recused himself; suit transferred to another court
- Judges
- MN Kullow
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Recusal, Perceived Bias, Transfer of Suit, Forum Shopping
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rhoda Tipis (suing as the legal rep of the estate of Justus Kantet Ole Tipis)
Plaintiff
Lemaria Ole Karia
Defendant
Raphael Patita Parleon
Defendant
Lemele Group Ranch
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Recusal of Judge
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge should recuse himself from hearing the case due to alleged bias arising from a complaint in another matter.
- 2 Whether the pending complaint before the Judicial Service Commission justifies recusal in the current proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, although no actual bias was demonstrated in the present case, the applicants' apprehension of bias was genuine and well-founded due to the pending complaint before the Judicial Service Commission in another matter involving the same judge. The judge emphasized that justice must not only be done but must be seen to be done, and that transparency and public confidence in the judiciary are paramount. Consequently, the judge determined that recusal was appropriate to uphold the integrity of the judicial process and ordered the transfer of the suit to another court for hearing and determination.
Court Disposition
application for recusal allowed; judge recused himself; suit transferred to another court
Orders
- The judge recuses himself from further hearing and conduct of the proceedings.
- The suit is transferred to Nakuru Environment and Land Court for hearing and determination.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT NAROK
ELC CAUSE NO. 530 OF 2017
RHODA TIPIS (suing as the legal rep of the estate
of Justus Kantet Ole Tipis).......................................PLAINTIFF
-VERSUS-
LEMARIA OLE KARIA...............................1ST DEFENDANT
RAPHAEL PATITA PARLEON..................2ND DEFENDANT
LEMELE GROUP RANCH.........................3RD DEFENDANT
RULING
The Application before me is the Plaintiffs/Applicants Notice of Motion dated 5th October, 2018 which was brought under Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act and Articles 50(1) and 159 (2) of the Constitution of Kenya in which the Applicants seek my disqualification and/or recusal on the basis that the court had demonstrated bias in another matter that is, Narok Environment and Land Court Suit No. 12 of 2018 and that there is a pending complaint before the Judicial Service Commission and that they may be prejudiced in the circumstances and be subjected to bias.
The Application was opposed by the 2nd and 3rd Respondents. The 1st Respondent averred that the Application is made in bad faith and that the Judge was never shown any bias in the matter as alluded and that the Applicants intention was to denial the proceedings since the matter has been in court for 19 years.
The 3rd Respondent in his opposition to the ground stated that the suit relating to the complaint against the Judge is a wholly different matter and it has no connection to the suit before the court and that the alleged impartiality has not been raised in the matter and that the Applicants are engaged in forum shopping because the Applicants had asked another Judge in the matter herein previously to disqualify himself.
The 3rd Respondent further stated that the grounds upon which a Judge may be asked to recuse himself is a matter such as interest, background and personal knowledge and comments and conduct during the proceeding and he averred that the Applicants have not demonstrated any justification based on the aforesaid grounds.
I have read the Application before me and oral submissions made by Mr. Njagi advocate and Mr. Maina Ngaruiya advocate for the Applicants and the Respondents respectively and the issue for determination before me is whether I should recuse myself in the instant case on account of a complaint that arose in another matter.
Mr. Njagi for the Applicants stated that Justice must be rooted in confidence and where a litigant is afraid of bias, the court ought to deal with his/her consensus.
From the submissions made on behalf of the Applicants, it is clear that because they have a pending complaint they may not be able to get justice and that bias may be demonstrated against them.
From the facts of the case even though the Applicants have not stated that I have shown bias against them in the instant case it is just simple apprehension which I feel is well founded. The Applicants have exercised a right accorded to them by the Constitution of Kenya and I am also bound by the same Constitution in which I derive my power and authority and it is thus my view that where Justice is concerned it is paramount that the same must be done transparently.
In the circumstances, I will recuse myself from further hearing and conduct of the proceeding and I order that this suit be transferred to Nakuru Environment and Land Court for hearing and determination.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED in open court at NAROK on this 5TH day of MARCH, 2019
Mohammed Noor Kullow
Judge
5/3/19
In the presence of:-
CA:Chuma
Mr Njagi for the Plaintiffs/Applicants
N/A for the Respondents