[2018] KEELRC 2578 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 2578 (KLR)

The court determined that there were procedural lapses in the service of summons and notification to the respondents regarding the transfer of the case from Nakuru to Eldoret. The absence of evidence showing that the respondents were notified of the change in registry and the lack of clarity on who received the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 2578 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Richard Derick Nyane; Respondent: Western Steel Mills Ltd; Respondent: Jokali Handling Services Ltd
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 156 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Pre Judgment Directions
Outcome
Judgment deferred; proceedings stayed pending proper service of mention notices on respondents.
Legal Topics
Service of Process, Procedural Fairness, Notice of Hearing
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Service of Process Procedural Fairness Notice of Hearing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Richard Derick Nyane

Claimant

Western Steel Mills Ltd

Respondent

Jokali Handling Services Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Pre Judgment Directions

  1. 1 Whether the respondents were properly served with summons and notified of the transfer of the case from Nakuru to Eldoret registry.
  2. 2 Whether proceeding to judgment without proper notification to the respondents would amount to procedural injustice.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that there were procedural lapses in the service of summons and notification to the respondents regarding the transfer of the case from Nakuru to Eldoret. The absence of evidence showing that the respondents were notified of the change in registry and the lack of clarity on who received the summons for each respondent raised concerns about procedural fairness. Proceeding to judgment under these circumstances would amount to injustice and violate the respondents' right to a fair hearing. Therefore, the court held that judgment could not be delivered until the respondents were properly served with mention notices to attend proceedings at Eldoret, ensuring that they are...

Court Disposition

Judgment deferred; proceedings stayed pending proper service of mention notices on respondents.

Orders

  • Proceedings are put in abeyance until the respondents are served with a mention notice to attend proceedings at Eldoret.
  • The matter shall be mentioned in 30 days on 30th October, 2018.