Kenya Judgment

Environment and Land Court · Environment and Land Court at Nairobi

Richard Gitau Mwaura v Nathan Manyali [2017] KEELC 871 (KLR)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found that the plaintiff had established, on a balance of probabilities, that he was the rightful allottee of Plot No. 10 at Omega Extension Project, Njiru, and that the defendant had unlawfully occupied the plot without any valid transfer or sale. The defendant, having failed to enter appearance or file a defence, did not controvert the plaintiff's evidence or substantiate the claim of purchase through an agent. The court accepted the plaintiff's documentary evidence, including the plot formalization card and correspondence, and found no credible evidence of a lawful sale or transfer to the defendant. Consequently, the court granted an order of eviction against the defendant and awarded costs to the plaintiff.

Court disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Orders

  • An order of eviction is given directed at the defendant, his agents, servants or any person acting on his behalf from plot known as plot No.10 at Omega Extension Project in Njiru within the Nairobi City County.
  • Costs of this suit are awarded to the plaintiff.
  • Interest on costs at court rates.

02

Material facts

Parties

Richard Gitau Mwaura

Plaintiff Counsel: Mr Wahome for Mr Bundi

Nathan Manyali

Defendant

Amounts and remedies

  • Additional Payment Alleged by Defendant: KES 10,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Land and Property Suit / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The plaintiff argued that he was the duly allocated owner of Plot No. 10 at Omega Extension Project, Njiru, as evidenced by a plot formalization card and his role as treasurer of the community-based organization. He denied ever selling the plot to the defendant or through any agent, specifically Moses Mburu Njuguna, whom he does not know. The plaintiff asserted that his illness was exploited by others to make him sign documents under false pretenses and that the defendant's occupation of the plot was without his consent or authority.
Respondent
The defendant did not enter appearance or file a defence. In a response to a demand letter, the defendant's advocate claimed that the plaintiff had sold the plot to the defendant through an agent, Moses Mburu Njuguna, and that the last payment was made before the Chief Njiru Location, with an additional KES 10,000 paid towards the purchase price. No evidence was adduced in court to support these claims.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Order 10 of the Civil Procedure Rules

    A party who fails to enter appearance or file a defence is deemed to have admitted the allegations made against them unless the court finds otherwise.

  2. 02

    Section 107, Evidence Act (Cap 80)

    The burden of proof in civil cases is on a balance of probabilities.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had established, on a balance of probabilities, that he was the rightful allottee of Plot No. 10 at Omega Extension Project, Njiru, and that the defendant had unlawfully occupied the plot without any valid transfer or sale. The defendant, having failed to enter appearance or file a defence, did not controvert the plaintiff's evidence or substantiate the claim of purchase through an agent. The court accepted the plaintiff's documentary evidence, including the plot formalization card and correspondence, and found no credible evidence of a lawful sale or transfer to the defendant. Consequently, the court granted an order of eviction against the defendant and awarded costs to the plaintiff.

Obiter and limits

  • A party who fails to defend a suit risks judgment being entered against them on the basis of uncontroverted evidence.
  • Community-based organizations must ensure proper documentation and transparency in land allocations to prevent disputes.

Court disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff.

  • An order of eviction is given directed at the defendant, his agents, servants or any person acting on his behalf from plot known as plot No.10 at Omega Extension Project in Njiru within the Nairobi City County.
  • Costs of this suit are awarded to the plaintiff.
  • Interest on costs at court rates.

Source and reliance status

Environment and Land Court

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Environment and Land Court

Judgment

[2017] KEELC 871 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE ENVIRONMENT & LAND COURT OF KENYA

AT MILIMANI

ELC CASE NO. 82 OF 2016

RICHARD GITAU MWAURA......................................PLAINTIFF

=VERSUS=

NATHAN MANYALI................................................DEFENDANT

JUDGEMENT

INTRODUCTION.

1. The Plaintiff filed this suit against the Defendant claiming the following reliefs:-

a.An order of eviction directed at the defendant, his agents, servants and or any other person whomsoever in possession of the plot known as plot No.10 measuring 25x10 situate at Omega Extension Project in Njiru, within Nairobi City County.

b.General damages for trespass

c.Costs of this suit

d.Interest on (b) and (c) above at court rates.

e.Any other relief that this Honourable Court may deem just to grant.

2. The defendant who was duly served with summons to enter appearance neither entered appearance nor filled defence. The hearing therefore proceeded by way of formal proof.

PLAINTIFF’S CASE.

3. The Plaintiff was a treasurer of Omega Extension Project, a community based organization registered under the Ministry of Gender, Children, and Social Development. The Plaintiff was allocated Plot No. 10 comprised in LR No. 15167/9/10/11/12 in Njiru area of Nairobi. The plaintiff developed cancer as a result of which he was seriously taken ill. While in that condition, his fellow officials made him sign a document which they duped him that it was an assurance that even if he died, his plot will remain safe.

4. The plaintiff went to hospital where he received treatment and became stable. When he was discharged, he went to his plot where he found an unknown person who had started constructing on the same. He was threatened by those who were constructing on the plot. He went to his advocate who wrote a demand letter to the defendant who was behind the construction on the plot. The defendant’s advocate responded and said that the plaintiff had sold his plot to the defendant through an agent called Moses Mburu Njuguna.

5. The plaintiff denies the defendant’s allegation that he sold his plot to the defendant through Moses Mburu Njuguna whom he says he does not know. He went and reported the threats to Obama Police Station.

ANALYSIS

6. I have gone through the documents produced by the Plaintiff in support of his case. He was indeed treasurer of Omega Extension Project, a registered community based organization. He produced a plot formalization card from Nairobi City County showing that he was allocated plot No.

10. He also produced a letter from Kenyatta National Hospital showing that he was being treated for Cancer at the facility. The Plaintiff also produced a demand letter dated 1st October 2015 addressed to the defendant and a response from the defendant’s advocates dated 19th October 2015.

7. The defendant claims in the response to the demand that the plaintiff sold his plot to him through one Moses Mburu Njuguna. That the last payment was made on 26th July 2013, before the Chief Njiru Location and that the defendant was forced to pay an additional 10,000/= towards the purchase price.

CONCLUSION.

8. The defendant had the opportunity to prove his allegations contained in the response to the demand letter but he did not by failing to enter appearance and file defence. In the absence of any evidence to controvert the evidence adduced by the Plaintiff, I find that the Plaintiff has proved his case against the defendant on a balance of probabilities. I therefore enter Judgement for the Plaintiff against the defendant as follows:-

a.An order of eviction is given directed at the defendant, his agents, servants or any person acting on his behalf from plot known as plot No.10 at Omega Extension Project in Njiru within the Nairobi City County.

b.Costs of this suit.

c.Interest on costs at court rates.

Dated, Signed and delivered at Nairobion this 29thday of November 2017.

E.O.OBAGA

JUDGE

In the presence of ;-

Mr Wahome for Mr Bundi for Plaintiff

Court Assistant: Hilda

E.O.OBAGA

JUDGE

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Order 10 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Section 107, Evidence Act (Cap 80)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.