Richard Gitau Mwaura v Nathan Manyali [2017] KEELC 871 (KLR)
- Citation
- [2017] KEELC 871 (KLR)
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Posture
- Land and Property Suit / Judgment
- Case number
- Environment & Land Case 82 of 2016
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Posture
- Land and Property Suit / Judgment
- Case number
- Environment & Land Case 82 of 2016
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court found that the plaintiff had established, on a balance of probabilities, that he was the rightful allottee of Plot No. 10 at Omega Extension Project, Njiru, and that the defendant had unlawfully occupied the plot without any valid transfer or sale. The defendant, having failed to enter appearance or file a defence, did not controvert the plaintiff's evidence or substantiate the claim of purchase through an agent. The court accepted the plaintiff's documentary evidence, including the plot formalization card and correspondence, and found no credible evidence of a lawful sale or transfer to the defendant. Consequently, the court granted an order of eviction against the defendant and awarded costs to the plaintiff.
Court disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Orders
- An order of eviction is given directed at the defendant, his agents, servants or any person acting on his behalf from plot known as plot No.10 at Omega Extension Project in Njiru within the Nairobi City County.
- Costs of this suit are awarded to the plaintiff.
- Interest on costs at court rates.
02
Material facts
Parties
Richard Gitau Mwaura
Plaintiff Counsel: Mr Wahome for Mr BundiNathan Manyali
DefendantAmounts and remedies
- Additional Payment Alleged by Defendant: KES 10,000
03
Procedural history
Posture
Land and Property Suit / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the plaintiff is the rightful allottee of Plot No. 10 at Omega Extension Project in Njiru, Nairobi City County.
- 02
Whether the defendant unlawfully occupied and trespassed on the plaintiff's plot.
- 03
Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an order of eviction and costs.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The plaintiff argued that he was the duly allocated owner of Plot No. 10 at Omega Extension Project, Njiru, as evidenced by a plot formalization card and his role as treasurer of the community-based organization. He denied ever selling the plot to the defendant or through any agent, specifically Moses Mburu Njuguna, whom he does not know. The plaintiff asserted that his illness was exploited by others to make him sign documents under false pretenses and that the defendant's occupation of the plot was without his consent or authority.
- Respondent
- The defendant did not enter appearance or file a defence. In a response to a demand letter, the defendant's advocate claimed that the plaintiff had sold the plot to the defendant through an agent, Moses Mburu Njuguna, and that the last payment was made before the Chief Njiru Location, with an additional KES 10,000 paid towards the purchase price. No evidence was adduced in court to support these claims.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Order 10 of the Civil Procedure Rules
A party who fails to enter appearance or file a defence is deemed to have admitted the allegations made against them unless the court finds otherwise.
- 02
Section 107, Evidence Act (Cap 80)
The burden of proof in civil cases is on a balance of probabilities.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had established, on a balance of probabilities, that he was the rightful allottee of Plot No. 10 at Omega Extension Project, Njiru, and that the defendant had unlawfully occupied the plot without any valid transfer or sale. The defendant, having failed to enter appearance or file a defence, did not controvert the plaintiff's evidence or substantiate the claim of purchase through an agent. The court accepted the plaintiff's documentary evidence, including the plot formalization card and correspondence, and found no credible evidence of a lawful sale or transfer to the defendant. Consequently, the court granted an order of eviction against the defendant and awarded costs to the plaintiff.
Obiter and limits
- A party who fails to defend a suit risks judgment being entered against them on the basis of uncontroverted evidence.
- Community-based organizations must ensure proper documentation and transparency in land allocations to prevent disputes.
Court disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff.
- An order of eviction is given directed at the defendant, his agents, servants or any person acting on his behalf from plot known as plot No.10 at Omega Extension Project in Njiru within the Nairobi City County.
- Costs of this suit are awarded to the plaintiff.
- Interest on costs at court rates.
Source and reliance status
Environment and Land Court
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Environment and Land Court
Judgment
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT & LAND COURT OF KENYA
AT MILIMANI
ELC CASE NO. 82 OF 2016
RICHARD GITAU MWAURA......................................PLAINTIFF
=VERSUS=
NATHAN MANYALI................................................DEFENDANT
JUDGEMENT
INTRODUCTION.
1. The Plaintiff filed this suit against the Defendant claiming the following reliefs:-
a.An order of eviction directed at the defendant, his agents, servants and or any other person whomsoever in possession of the plot known as plot No.10 measuring 25x10 situate at Omega Extension Project in Njiru, within Nairobi City County.
b.General damages for trespass
c.Costs of this suit
d.Interest on (b) and (c) above at court rates.
e.Any other relief that this Honourable Court may deem just to grant.
2. The defendant who was duly served with summons to enter appearance neither entered appearance nor filled defence. The hearing therefore proceeded by way of formal proof.
PLAINTIFF’S CASE.
3. The Plaintiff was a treasurer of Omega Extension Project, a community based organization registered under the Ministry of Gender, Children, and Social Development. The Plaintiff was allocated Plot No. 10 comprised in LR No. 15167/9/10/11/12 in Njiru area of Nairobi. The plaintiff developed cancer as a result of which he was seriously taken ill. While in that condition, his fellow officials made him sign a document which they duped him that it was an assurance that even if he died, his plot will remain safe.
4. The plaintiff went to hospital where he received treatment and became stable. When he was discharged, he went to his plot where he found an unknown person who had started constructing on the same. He was threatened by those who were constructing on the plot. He went to his advocate who wrote a demand letter to the defendant who was behind the construction on the plot. The defendant’s advocate responded and said that the plaintiff had sold his plot to the defendant through an agent called Moses Mburu Njuguna.
5. The plaintiff denies the defendant’s allegation that he sold his plot to the defendant through Moses Mburu Njuguna whom he says he does not know. He went and reported the threats to Obama Police Station.
ANALYSIS
6. I have gone through the documents produced by the Plaintiff in support of his case. He was indeed treasurer of Omega Extension Project, a registered community based organization. He produced a plot formalization card from Nairobi City County showing that he was allocated plot No.
10. He also produced a letter from Kenyatta National Hospital showing that he was being treated for Cancer at the facility. The Plaintiff also produced a demand letter dated 1st October 2015 addressed to the defendant and a response from the defendant’s advocates dated 19th October 2015.
7. The defendant claims in the response to the demand that the plaintiff sold his plot to him through one Moses Mburu Njuguna. That the last payment was made on 26th July 2013, before the Chief Njiru Location and that the defendant was forced to pay an additional 10,000/= towards the purchase price.
CONCLUSION.
8. The defendant had the opportunity to prove his allegations contained in the response to the demand letter but he did not by failing to enter appearance and file defence. In the absence of any evidence to controvert the evidence adduced by the Plaintiff, I find that the Plaintiff has proved his case against the defendant on a balance of probabilities. I therefore enter Judgement for the Plaintiff against the defendant as follows:-
a.An order of eviction is given directed at the defendant, his agents, servants or any person acting on his behalf from plot known as plot No.10 at Omega Extension Project in Njiru within the Nairobi City County.
b.Costs of this suit.
c.Interest on costs at court rates.
Dated, Signed and delivered at Nairobion this 29thday of November 2017.
E.O.OBAGA
JUDGE
In the presence of ;-
Mr Wahome for Mr Bundi for Plaintiff
Court Assistant: Hilda
E.O.OBAGA
JUDGE
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.