[2018] KEELC 351 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 351 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff is the registered owner of L.R. NO. 7830/120 and that the defendant, by marking the building for demolition and causing the plaintiff's tenants to vacate, committed acts of trespass. The defendant failed to appear at the hearing or controvert the plaintiff's evidence. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 351 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Richard Kipmalel Chesimet; Defendant: Nandi County Government
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 153 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Land and Environment Case / Judgment
Outcome
judgment_for_plaintiff
Legal Topics
Trespass to Land, Ownership Dispute, Eviction Orders, Permanent Injunction, Loss of Rental Income
Source Language
en
Land and Property Trespass to Land Ownership Dispute Eviction Orders Permanent Injunction Loss of Rental Income

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Richard Kipmalel Chesimet

Plaintiff

Nandi County Government

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Environment Case / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is the lawful registered proprietor of L.R. NO. 7830/120.
  2. 2 Whether the defendant trespassed on the plaintiff's land and is liable for eviction.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to loss of earnings and other damages as claimed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff is the registered owner of L.R. NO. 7830/120 and that the defendant, by marking the building for demolition and causing the plaintiff's tenants to vacate, committed acts of trespass. The defendant failed to appear at the hearing or controvert the plaintiff's evidence. The court accepted the plaintiff's valuation and calculation of loss of rental income, as the defendant did not challenge these figures. The plaintiff proved his case on a balance of probabilities and was entitled to a declaration of ownership, eviction of the defendant, a permanent injunction, and compensation for loss of earnings. The court awarded the plaintiff Kshs. 3,708,320 for loss...

Court Disposition

judgment_for_plaintiff

Orders

  • Declaration that the plaintiff is the registered proprietor and owner of L.R. NO. 7830/120.
  • Eviction order against the defendant, its agents and/or servants from L.R. NO. 7830/120.