[2017] KEHC 1175 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had provided a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the appeal, namely the dissolution of their previous advocates' firm and the resultant communication breakdown. The explanation was not rebutted by the respondent. The court held that the applicants satisfied the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 1175 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Richard Muthusi; Defendant: Patrick Gituma Ngomo; Defendant: Danros (Kenya) Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Makueni
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 4 October 2017
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 138 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Leave to Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- Application for stay of execution and leave to appeal out of time allowed on conditions.
- Judges
- CM Kariuki
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Monetary Decree, Security for Costs, Substantial Loss, Judicial Discretion
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Muthusi
Plaintiff
Patrick Gituma Ngomo
Defendant
Danros (Kenya) Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to stay of execution pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the applicants have demonstrated sufficient cause for enlargement of time to file an appeal out of time.
- 3 Whether the applicants have met the conditions for grant of stay under Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had provided a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the appeal, namely the dissolution of their previous advocates' firm and the resultant communication breakdown. The explanation was not rebutted by the respondent. The court held that the applicants satisfied the threshold for extension of time under Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act and the principles in Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat v IEBC & 7 Others. On stay of execution, the court noted that the applicants had expressed willingness to provide security and that the respondent had not demonstrated ability to refund the decretal sum if the appeal succeeded. Applying Order 42 Rule...
Court Disposition
Application for stay of execution and leave to appeal out of time allowed on conditions.
Orders
- Appeal to be filed and served within 14 days from the date of the ruling.
- Stay of execution granted on condition that Kshs. 300,000 is paid to the claimant within 30 days from the date of the ruling; in default, the application stands dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment