[2016] KEHC 6039 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 6039 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had provided a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the appeal, namely, financial constraints that prevented his relatives from hiring a lawyer in time. Since the application was unopposed by the State, the court exercised its discretion and granted the applicant leave to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 6039 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Richard Mutie Mbindyo; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kitui
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Appeal 102 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
Application allowed.
Judges
LN Mutende
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Extension of Time, Criminal Appeal Procedure
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Leave to Appeal Out of Time Extension of Time Criminal Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Richard Mutie Mbindyo

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to appeal out of time.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had provided a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the appeal, namely, financial constraints that prevented his relatives from hiring a lawyer in time. Since the application was unopposed by the State, the court exercised its discretion and granted the applicant leave to appeal out of time, allowing him to file the appeal within fourteen days.

Court Disposition

Application allowed.

Orders

  • Applicant granted leave to appeal out of time within 14 days.