[2018] KEELRC 439 (KLR)
The court found that the claimant's summary dismissal was unfair as the respondent failed to issue a show cause letter or provide an opportunity to be heard, contrary to sections 35 and 41 of the Employment Act, 2007. The claimant's evidence was unchallenged, and the court accepted his claims for pay in lieu of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEELRC 439 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Richard Mutsoli Angatia; Respondent: Two Four Seven Services Ltd; Respondent: Erick Kimotho
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 1116 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part; summary dismissal declared unfair; monetary awards granted as specified.
- Judges
- MSA Makhandia
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Termination, Summary Dismissal, Notice Pay, Compensation for Unfair Dismissal, Annual Leave Entitlement, Salary Arrears
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Mutsoli Angatia
Claimant
Two Four Seven Services Ltd
Respondent
Erick Kimotho
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant's employment was unfairly terminated contrary to the Employment Act, 2007.
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to pay in lieu of notice, compensation, pro rata leave, and salary for September 2012.
- 3 Whether severance pay and underpayments are applicable in the circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claimant's summary dismissal was unfair as the respondent failed to issue a show cause letter or provide an opportunity to be heard, contrary to sections 35 and 41 of the Employment Act, 2007. The claimant's evidence was unchallenged, and the court accepted his claims for pay in lieu of notice, compensation for unfair dismissal, pro rata leave, and salary for September 2012. Claims for severance pay and underpayments were dismissed as severance pay applies only in redundancy situations and the claimant's role as a motorcycle driver could not be equated to a medium-sized vehicle driver for minimum wage purposes. No evidential basis was laid for overtime claims. The...
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part; summary dismissal declared unfair; monetary awards granted as specified.
Orders
- The claimant is awarded pay in lieu of notice of Kshs 11,500.
- The claimant is awarded compensation for unfair dismissal of Kshs 23,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
45 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NO. 1116 OF 2013
RICHARD MUTSOLI ANGATIA.............................CLAIMANT
v
TWO FOUR SEVEN SERVICES LTD..........1st RESPONDENT
ERICK KIMOTHO.......................................2nd RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. This is an undefended Cause for the Respondents were served with Notice of Summons on 15 August 2013 but failed to file a Response.
2. Despite service of a hearing notice on 12 August 2018, the Respondents failed to attend the hearing on 23 October 2018.
3. The Claimant alleged unfair termination of employment and breach of contract and gave sworn testimony which remained unchallenged/unrebutted.
4. The Claimant filed submissions on 26 October 2018. The Court has considered the pleadings, evidence and submissions.
Unfair termination of employment
5. The Claimant stated that on 28 September 2012, the 2nd Respondent instructed him to leave work because he had allegedly given a work motor cycle to unknown person who was seen riding it along Lower Hill road.
6. The Claimant contended that he was not issued with a show cause letter nor afforded an opportunity to be heard before being sent away.
7. The testimony remaining unchallenged, the Court finds that the termination of the Claimant’s employment was unfair in terms of sections 35 and 41 of the Employment Act, 2007.
Pay in lieu of notice
8. The Claimant is therefore entitled to 1 month pay in lieu of notice.
Compensation
9. Further, and considering that the Claimant served for about 1 year, the Court assesses compensation equivalent to 2 months gross wages.
Leave
10. Annual leave of at least 21 days is a statutory entitlement, and in terms of section 10(3) and (7) as read with section 28 of the Employment Act, 2007, the Court will allow this head of claim.
Salary for September 2012
11. The Respondent had offered to pay the Claimant wages for September 2012 in the dismissal letter and without records to show the same was paid, the Court will allow the claim.
Severance pay
12. The Claimant did not prove or suggest that this was a case of redundancy, and therefore severance pay is not applicable.
Underpayments
13. The Claimant anchored this head of claim on minimum wages prescribed for a driver (medium sized vehicle).
14. A motor cycle driver, in the view of the Court cannot be equated to a driver of a medium sized vehicle.
Overtime
15. The Claimant did not lay an evidential foundation to overtime work/pay.
Conclusion and Orders
16. The Court finds and holds that the summary dismissal of the Claimant was unfair and awards him
(a) Pay in lieu of Notice Kshs 11,500/-
(b) Compensation Kshs 23,000/-
(c) Pro rata leave Kshs 11,500/-
(d) Salary for Sept 2012 Kshs 11,500/-
TOTAL Kshs 57,500/-
17. Claimant to have costs on half scale.
Delivered, dated and signed in Nairobi on this 7th day of December 2018.
Radido Stephen
Judge
Appearances
For Claimant Mr. Kandere instructed by S.K. Opiyo & Co. Advocates
Court Assistant Lindsey