[2013] KEHC 2707 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 2707 (KLR)

The court declined to grant the preservatory order sought by the applicant because the certificate of urgency was not accompanied by a formal application or supporting affidavit, rendering it procedurally defective and unsupported by evidence. Furthermore, the Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections) Petition...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 2707 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Richard N. Kalembe Ndile; Respondent: Dr Patrick Musimba Mweu; Respondent: Returning Officer Kibwezi West Constituency; Respondent: Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Machakos
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Election Petition 1 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Election Petition / Interlocutory Application (certificate of Urgency) Prior to Hearing
Outcome
Application for preservatory order declined; no orders issued on the certificate of urgency.
Judges
DAS Majanja
Legal Topics
Preservation of Evidence, Ballot Box Custody, Interlocutory Orders, Election Procedure
Source Language
en
Election Petitions Preservation of Evidence Ballot Box Custody Interlocutory Orders Election Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Richard N. Kalembe Ndile

Applicant

Dr Patrick Musimba Mweu

Respondent

Returning Officer Kibwezi West Constituency

Respondent

Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Election Petition / Interlocutory Application (certificate of Urgency) Prior to Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the court should issue a preservatory order for the custody of ballot boxes pending the hearing of the election petition.
  2. 2 Whether a certificate of urgency without a supporting application or affidavit can warrant judicial intervention.
  3. 3 Whether the Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections) Petition Rules 2013 provide for conservatory orders regarding ballot boxes.

Ratio Decidendi

The court declined to grant the preservatory order sought by the applicant because the certificate of urgency was not accompanied by a formal application or supporting affidavit, rendering it procedurally defective and unsupported by evidence. Furthermore, the Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections) Petition Rules 2013 already provide a mechanism for the custody of ballot boxes, specifically requiring the Commission to deliver them to the Registrar before trial. There is no legal basis for the court to intervene by issuing a conservatory order in the absence of a proper application and supporting evidence, nor is there a rule permitting such an order in these circumstances. The...

Court Disposition

Application for preservatory order declined; no orders issued on the certificate of urgency.

Orders

  • The application for a preservatory order regarding the ballot boxes is declined.
  • No oral arguments or further applications on this matter will be entertained.