[2013] KEHC 3845 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff, as executor and registered proprietor of the suit property pursuant to a certificate of confirmation of grant, is entitled to give effect to the wishes of the deceased as set out in her will. The deceased directed that the property be sold and proceeds distributed among the heirs,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 3845 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Richard Njoroge Nyanjui; Defendant: Serah Njeri Wanjiru
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 29 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Land and Environment Case / Judgment After Formal Proof
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff. Eviction order granted.
- Legal Topics
- Eviction of Beneficiary, Administration of Estate, Confirmation of Grant, Distribution of Estate, Rights of Heirs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Njoroge Nyanjui
Plaintiff
Serah Njeri Wanjiru
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Land and Environment Case / Judgment After Formal Proof
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff, as executor and registered proprietor, is entitled to evict the defendant from L.R. No. Limuru/Rironi/T.348.
- 2 Whether the defendant's continued occupation frustrates the administration and distribution of the estate as per the confirmed grant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff, as executor and registered proprietor of the suit property pursuant to a certificate of confirmation of grant, is entitled to give effect to the wishes of the deceased as set out in her will. The deceased directed that the property be sold and proceeds distributed among the heirs, including the defendant. The defendant's continued occupation of the property, despite being entitled only to a share of the proceeds, has frustrated the plaintiff's ability to execute his mandate as administrator. The court held that the defendant has no right to remain on the property to the detriment of the estate and the other beneficiaries. Accordingly, the plaintiff is...
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff. Eviction order granted.
Orders
- The defendant shall vacate L.R. No. Limuru/Rironi/T.348 forthwith.
- In default of compliance, the plaintiff is authorized to evict the defendant from the suit property.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
High Court at Nairobi (Nairobi Law Courts)
Environmental & Land Case 29 of 2011 [if !mso]> <style> v:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} </style> <![endif]
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF MARY WANJIRU THIONGO alias MARY WANJIRU (DECEASED)
RICHARD NJOROGE NYANJUI ...............................PLAINTIFF
-VERSUS-
SERAH NJERI WANJIRU......................................DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
The Plaintiff filed this suit by way of a plaint dated 28th January 2011 and filed in court on 31st January 2011. The plaint seeks an order of eviction of the Defendant form L.R. No. Limuru/Rironi/T.348 and the costs of the suit.
The Defendant was served with the summons to enter appearance as per return of service filed in court on 21st March 2011 but did not enter an appearance. The Plaintiff applied for judgment and the Deputy Registrar entered interlocutory judgment against the Defendant on 31st March 2011.
The suit was listed for formal proof before me on 13th March 2013 when the plaintiff testified. The plaintiff’s evidence is that he is the registered proprietor of L.R. No. Limuru/Rironi/T348 and that he was so registered pursuant to a certificate of confirmation of grant in regard to the estate of Mary Wanjiru Thiongo (deceased). The plaintiff was pursuant Succession Cause No. HC 634 of 2006 appointed executor of the will of the said Mary Wanjiru Thiongo (deceased) and by virtue of the certificate of confirmation of grant in the said succession cause was entitled to give effect to the wishes of the deceased as per her last testament.
It is the plaintiff’s evidence that the deceased wished the suit property to be sold and the proceeds distributed to the heirs including the defendant as per certificate of confirmation of grant.
The plaintiff states that the deceased wishes and has found and identified potential purchasers for the suit property but has been unable to complete the sale, transaction as the Defendant continues to occupy the suit property and has refused to vacate the premises to facilitate the sale in accordance with the deceased wishes even though the defendant is only entitled to 10% of the sale proceeds as per the confirmed grant.
The plaintiff states that he would like to accomplish his mandate as the administrator of the deceased estate and urges the court to issue an order for the eviction of the interest at court rates.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 17TH DAY OF APRIL 2013.
J. M. MUTUNGI
JUDGE
In the presence of:
………………………………………………… for the Plaintiff
………………………………………………… for the Defendant