[2020] KEHC 3831 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 3831 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to provide any evidence that he applied for copies of the proceedings or judgment, nor did he offer a plausible or acceptable explanation for the two-year delay in seeking leave to appeal. The supporting affidavit was not commissioned, and there was no material before the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 3831 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Richard Odhiambo; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application 16 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Delay in Filing Appeal, Criminal Conviction Appeal
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Out of Time Delay in Filing Appeal Criminal Conviction Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Richard Odhiambo

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient explanation for the delay in filing the appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to leave to appeal out of time under section 349 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to provide any evidence that he applied for copies of the proceedings or judgment, nor did he offer a plausible or acceptable explanation for the two-year delay in seeking leave to appeal. The supporting affidavit was not commissioned, and there was no material before the court to support the applicant's claims. The court held that the application was brought with inordinate delay, amounting to laches, and was devoid of merit. Consequently, the application was dismissed as an afterthought.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal out of time is dismissed.
  • File closed.