[2020] KEHC 3089 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 3089 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant satisfactorily explained the delay in filing the appeal, attributing it to the late supply of proceedings and judgment. The absence of opposition from the respondents further supported the applicant's position. The court exercised its discretion to allow the application, granting...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 3089 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Richard Oduor Abura; Respondent: Mareen Okoth; Respondent: International Centre for AIDS Care & Tratment Programme
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 4 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Extension of Time, Service of Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Out of Time Extension of Time Service of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Richard Oduor Abura

Applicant

Mareen Okoth

Respondent

International Centre for AIDS Care & Tratment Programme

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether leave to appeal out of time should be granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant satisfactorily explained the delay in filing the appeal, attributing it to the late supply of proceedings and judgment. The absence of opposition from the respondents further supported the applicant's position. The court exercised its discretion to allow the application, granting leave to file and serve a memorandum of appeal within ten days, with no order as to costs.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The applicant is granted leave to file and serve a Memorandum of Appeal upon the Respondent’s Counsel within ten (10) days from the date of the ruling, annexing a copy of this ruling and order.
  • No order as to costs.