[2021] KEHC 9576 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 9576 (KLR)

The court found that the appellant's absence on the first hearing date was satisfactorily explained by his university examination commitments. Given that it was the first hearing and the explanation was plausible, the interests of justice required that the appellant be given an opportunity to prosecute his suit. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 9576 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Richard Onynge; Respondent: David Kirimojo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 35 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal_allowed
Judges
SN Riechi
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Non Attendance, Reinstatement of Suit, Appeals Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Dismissal for Non Attendance Reinstatement of Suit Appeals Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Richard Onynge

Appellant

David Kirimojo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the appellant has demonstrated sufficient grounds for reinstatement of his suit dismissed for non-attendance.
  2. 2 Whether the explanation for non-attendance on the first hearing date is plausible.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant's absence on the first hearing date was satisfactorily explained by his university examination commitments. Given that it was the first hearing and the explanation was plausible, the interests of justice required that the appellant be given an opportunity to prosecute his suit. The trial court's dismissal was therefore set aside, and the suit was ordered reinstated to allow the matter to be heard on its merits.

Court Disposition

appeal_allowed

Orders

  • The appeal is allowed.
  • The order of dismissal is set aside.