[2011] KEHC 2158 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the grant of leave to apply for an order of certiorari. The decision of the Ainamoi Land Disputes Tribunal was challenged on the basis that it was made outside the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Land Disputes Tribunals Act, and the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] KEHC 2158 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Richard Serem; Applicant: Joel K. Serem; Respondent: Annah Serem; Respondent: Gilbert Robert Kipkirui; Respondent: The Chairman Ainamoi Land Disputes Tribunal; Respondent: The Resident Magistrate’s, Kericho
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kericho
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Miscellaneous Application 14 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Apply for Certiorari
- Outcome
- Leave to apply for certiorari granted; leave to operate as stay of impugned decisions.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Certiorari, Jurisdiction of Tribunals, Land Disputes, Stay of Execution
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Serem
Applicant
Joel K. Serem
Applicant
Annah Serem
Respondent
Gilbert Robert Kipkirui
Respondent
The Chairman Ainamoi Land Disputes Tribunal
Respondent
The Resident Magistrate’s, Kericho
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Apply for Certiorari
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Ainamoi Land Disputes Tribunal acted outside its statutory jurisdiction under Section 3 of the Land Disputes Tribunals Act.
- 2 Whether the adoption of a void tribunal decision by the Resident Magistrate's Court can validate the decision.
- 3 Whether sufficient grounds exist to grant leave to apply for an order of certiorari.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the grant of leave to apply for an order of certiorari. The decision of the Ainamoi Land Disputes Tribunal was challenged on the basis that it was made outside the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Land Disputes Tribunals Act, and the subsequent adoption of this decision by the Resident Magistrate's Court did not cure its invalidity. The court held that these issues raised arguable points of law suitable for judicial review. Consequently, leave was granted to the applicants to apply for certiorari, and the leave was ordered to operate as a stay of both the tribunal's decision and the court order until the...
Court Disposition
Leave to apply for certiorari granted; leave to operate as stay of impugned decisions.
Orders
- Leave is granted to the applicants to apply for an order of certiorari as prayed in the Chamber Summons dated 29th March 2011.
- Notice of Motion to be filed within 21 days and served within 14 days of filing upon the respondents and affected persons.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
REPUBLICOF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KERICHO
CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 14 OF 2011 (JR)
IN THE MATTER OF THE LAW REFORM ACT, CAP 26
BETWEEN
RICHARD SEREM……….......…………………………………………..1ST APPLICANT
JOEL K. SEREM……….........……………………………………………2ND APPLICANT
VS.
ANNAH SEREM…………….......………………………………………1ST RESPONDENT
GILBERT ROBERT KIPKIRUI………............……………………….....2ND RESPONDENT
THE CHAIRMAN AINAMOI LAND DISPUTES
TRIBUNAL……………..........…………………………………………....3RD RESPONDENT
THE RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S, KERICHO……….................………..4TH RESPONDENT
RULING
The two Applicants, Richard Serem and Joel K. Serem, seek in their Chamber Summons application dated 29th March 2011 leave to apply to this Court for an order of certiorari to remove into this Court for quashing firstly the decision of the Ainamoi Land Disputes Tribunal dated 21/1/2011 and secondly the order of the Resident Magistrate at Kericho made on 21/2/2011 in Kericho C. M. Misc. Application No. 4 of 2011.
Mr. Migiro, the learned Counsel for the Applicant, urged the Court to grant the leave sought because, he submitted, the decision of Ainamoi Land Disputes Tribunal was invalid as it was made outside the powers conferred on the said Tribunal by Section 3 of the Land Disputes Tribunals Act, No. 18 of 1990. This invalid decision, he said, is what the Resident Magistrate adopted as an order of the Court. He submitted that the adoption of the void decision did not validate it and that the court order was also a nullity.
I have duly considered the submissions made by Mr. Migiro. I have also perused the Statement of Facts and the Verifying Affidavit filed contemporaneously with the application as required by Rule 1 (2) of Order 53of the Civil Procedure Rules. I am satisfied that the applicants have shown sufficient grounds for the grant of the leave they seek. Accordingly, I allow the application and grant the applicant leave to apply for an order of certiorari as prayed in prayers (a) and (b) of the Chamber Summons application dated 29th March 2010.
I direct that a Notice of Motion shall be filed within 21 days of the date hereof and shall be served within 14 days of filing upon the Respondents and all such persons as may be affected by it.
The Notice of Motion shall be mentioned on 7/7/2011 when a hearing date shall be given. Seven days prior to 7/7/2011, an affidavit shall be filed pursuant to Rule 3 (3) of Order 53 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
The leave herein granted shall operate as a stay of the decision dated 21//1/2010 made by Ainamoi Land Disputes Tribunal as well as a stay of the Court order dated 21/2/2011 made by the Principal magistrate at Kericho in Kericho C. M. C. Misc. App. No. 4 of 2011 until the Notice of Motion is heard and determined or until further orders of this Court. If the Notice of Motion is not filed as herein directed, the stay herein ordered shall lapse immediately on expiry of the period within which the motion is directed to be filed.
The costs of the application for leave shall be costs of the Motion.
DATEDat KERICHO this 13th Day of April, 2011
G B M KARIUKI, SC
RESIDENT JUDGE
COUNSEL APPEARING
Mr. Migiro, Advocate, for the Applicant
Mr. N. Bett, Court clerk