[2025] KEELRC 1061 (KLR)

[2025] KEELRC 1061 (KLR)

The court found that the cause of action accrued on 21 October 2014 when the grievant was informed of his dismissal. Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007, requires that claims for unfair dismissal be filed within three years from the date the cause of action arises. The present cause was filed on 8 February 2024,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEELRC 1061 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Rift Valley Railways Workers' Union (K); Respondent: Kenya Railways Corporation
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause E103 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
Cause struck out for want of jurisdiction as time-barred.
Judges
S Radido
Legal Topics
Unlawful Dismissal, Limitation Periods, Jurisdiction of Court
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unlawful Dismissal Limitation Periods Jurisdiction of Court

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rift Valley Railways Workers' Union (K)

Applicant

Kenya Railways Corporation

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to hear the claim for unlawful dismissal filed outside the statutory limitation period.
  2. 2 Whether the claim is time-barred under section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007.
  3. 3 Whether the suit is incompetent and an abuse of court process.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the cause of action accrued on 21 October 2014 when the grievant was informed of his dismissal. Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007, requires that claims for unfair dismissal be filed within three years from the date the cause of action arises. The present cause was filed on 8 February 2024, well beyond the prescribed limitation period. Consequently, the court held that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the matter and struck out the cause for being time-barred.

Court Disposition

Cause struck out for want of jurisdiction as time-barred.

Orders

  • The cause is struck out for want of jurisdiction.
  • No order as to costs.