[2019] KEHAT 17 (KLR)
The Tribunal found that while the evidence was insufficient to establish unauthorized disclosure of the Claimant’s HIV status by the Respondent, there was compelling evidence of emotional and psychological suffering inflicted upon the Claimant by the Respondent following her disclosure of her HIV status. The Tribunal held that its jurisdiction did not extend to awarding damages for physical injuries, as these fall outside the civil scope of the Tribunal’s mandate. However, the Tribunal is empowered to award damages for emotional and psychological harm under the HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act. The Tribunal also determined that compelling a public apology would infringe upon the...
- Citation
- [2019] KEHAT 17 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: RN; Respondent: ROO
- Court
- HIV and AIDS Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2019
- Case Number
- Tribunal Case 10 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Claim / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for the claimant in part
- Legal Topics
- Hiv Status Disclosure, Emotional Distress Damages, Domestic Violence Allegations, Confidentiality Rights
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RN
Applicant
ROO
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent abused the Claimant as alleged in the Statement of Claim and Notice of Motion dated 6th November, 2018.
- 2 Whether the Respondent disclosed the Claimant’s HIV status without her consent.
- 3 Whether the Claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought, including damages and a public apology.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that while the evidence was insufficient to establish unauthorized disclosure of the Claimant’s HIV status by the Respondent, there was compelling evidence of emotional and psychological suffering inflicted upon the Claimant by the Respondent following her disclosure of her HIV status. The Tribunal held that its jurisdiction did not extend to awarding damages for physical injuries, as these fall outside the civil scope of the Tribunal’s mandate. However, the Tribunal is empowered to award damages for emotional and psychological harm under the HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act. The Tribunal also determined that compelling a public apology would infringe upon the...
Court Disposition
judgment for the claimant in part
Orders
- The Claimant is awarded Kshs 300,000 for emotional and psychological suffering.
- The Claimant is awarded costs of the suit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment