[2020] KEHC 7391 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 7391 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants, as aggrieved parties, have a right to appeal and that the subject parcels of land, having already devolved and transferred to new owners, could be disposed of or otherwise dealt with, thereby defeating the purpose of the appeal. The court exercised its inherent jurisdiction to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 7391 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Robenson Murema Mwangi; Applicant: Zipporah Wangari Mwangi; Respondent: Festina Wanjiku Kamuri
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyahururu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 2 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Succession Appeal / Interlocutory Application for Prohibitory Order Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed; prohibitory order granted pending appeal.
Legal Topics
Succession Disputes, Revocation of Grant, Preservation of Estate, Prohibitory Orders
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Succession Disputes Revocation of Grant Preservation of Estate Prohibitory Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robenson Murema Mwangi

Applicant

Zipporah Wangari Mwangi

Applicant

Festina Wanjiku Kamuri

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Appeal / Interlocutory Application for Prohibitory Order Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether a prohibitory order should be issued to preserve the subject parcels of land pending determination of the appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants have demonstrated sufficient grounds for preservation of the estate property.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants, as aggrieved parties, have a right to appeal and that the subject parcels of land, having already devolved and transferred to new owners, could be disposed of or otherwise dealt with, thereby defeating the purpose of the appeal. The court exercised its inherent jurisdiction to preserve the substratum of the appeal by issuing a prohibitory order against dealings with the land until the appeal is heard and determined. The court further noted that the respondent and new registered owners would not suffer any significant loss from the order, apart from a delay, and that the interests of justice required the applicants to be given an opportunity to have...

Court Disposition

Application allowed; prohibitory order granted pending appeal.

Orders

  • A prohibitory order is issued prohibiting any dealings with parcels Nyandarua/Kirima/5265, 5266, and 5267 in any adverse manner or disposing of them until the appeal is heard and finalized.
  • The applicants must ensure the appeal is set down for hearing and heard within the next six months.