[2012] KEHC 5193 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution's evidence, particularly the eyewitness testimony of P.W.2 and corroborating circumstances, placed the accused at the scene and linked him to the offence of murder. The evidence was sufficient to establish a prima facie case against the accused, thus necessitating that he be...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] KEHC 5193 (KLR)
- Parties
- Accused: Robert Mungai Maina; Prosecutor: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 48 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Whether to Place Accused on Defence After Prosecution Case
- Outcome
- Accused placed on his defence.
- Judges
- JK Sergon
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Criminal Procedure, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Mungai Maina
Accused
Republic
Prosecutor
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Whether to Place Accused on Defence After Prosecution Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant placing him on his defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution's evidence, particularly the eyewitness testimony of P.W.2 and corroborating circumstances, placed the accused at the scene and linked him to the offence of murder. The evidence was sufficient to establish a prima facie case against the accused, thus necessitating that he be placed on his defence in accordance with Section 306(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court was satisfied that the prosecution had met the threshold required at this stage, and the accused must now indicate whether he will testify and whether he will call witnesses.
Court Disposition
Accused placed on his defence.
Orders
- The accused is placed on his defence and required to indicate whether he will testify and whether he will call witnesses.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLICOF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NYERI
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 48 OF 2008
ROBER MUNGAI MAINA......................……………………………… ACCUSED
VERSUS
REPUBLIC..............................…………………..…..…….….…. PROSECUTOR
RULING
Robert Mungai Maina, the accused person herein, is before this Court on the information of the Honourable Attorney General dated 9th September 2008, to face a charge of murder contrary toSection 203 as read with Section 204of the Penal Code. The particulars of the offence are that on 27th day of August 2008 at Kaharo village in Murang’a South District within Central Province he murdered Julius Mwangi Maina.
The prosecution submitted the evidence of eight (8) witnesses to support its case. At the close of the prosecution’s case, learned counsels appearing in this case were invited to make submissions under Section 306 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Counsels opted not to make any submissions.
I have considered the evidence of the eight (8) prosecution witnesses. The question which must be answered at this stage is whether or not the prosecution has established aprima facie case to enable this court make a finding on whether or not I should place the accused person on his defence? The eye witness in this case, Samuel Maina (P.W.2), told this Court that he was at home on 24th august 2008 when at 7. 30 p.m. Robert Mungai Maina the accused, arrived. The duo exchanged pleasantries shortly before Julius Mwangi, deceased arrived. When the deceased arrived he inquired from the accused what he had been discussing with their father (P.W.2). It is said the accused began to retreat before cutting the deceased on the ear. P.W.2 said the deceased fell down and the accused fled. P.W.2 and the area chief made arrangements to have the deceased transported to hospital where he was pronounced dead upon arrival in the hospital. P.W.2 said that the deceased and the accused being his sons had picked up a quarrel that day though they had a cordial relationship before the incident. P.W.2 further stated that duo were under the influence of alcohol. Esther Wamwai (P.W.3) stated that she was inside the house and when she came out she saw the deceased lying down. There was a blood stained panga lying next to the deceased’s body. P.W.3 claimed she took possession of the panga and hid it inside the house. It is alleged by P.W.3 that both the deceased and the accused were drunk.
In my humble view the evidence tendered put the accused at the scene of the crime. The accused is linked with the offence of murder. In sum, I am convinced the prosecution has made out aprima faciecase hence I am enjoined to place the accused on his defence.
It is now upon the accused and his legal advisors to indicate whether the accused will personally testify and if so whether he would give sworn or unsworn testimony. Whether the accused is going to summons independent witnesses?
Dated and delivered at Nyeri this 15th day of February,2012.
…………………………………….
J. K. SERGON
JUDGE