[2010] KEHC 2774 (KLR)
The court found that Robert Amukmbwa Andika and Florence Tsisiche misrepresented themselves as beneficiaries of the deceased's estate, with Andika variously claiming to be the son, only son, or dependant of Florence, none of which was supported by evidence. The uncontested testimony established that Andika had no...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 2774 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Robert Amukmbwa Andika; Applicant: Benina James Machengo
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 475 of 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant
- Outcome
- Application for revocation of grant allowed; grant and registration in respondent's name revoked.
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Grant, Beneficiaries Entitlement, Trusts in Succession, Fraudulent Administration
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Amukmbwa Andika
Respondent
Benina James Machengo
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration issued to Robert Amukmbwa Andika should be revoked under section 76 of the Law of Succession Act.
- 2 Whether Robert Amukmbwa Andika and Florence Tsisiche were lawful beneficiaries or related to the deceased.
- 3 Whether the registration of land parcel Butsotso/Bukura/250 in the name of Robert Amukmbwa Andika was lawful.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Robert Amukmbwa Andika and Florence Tsisiche misrepresented themselves as beneficiaries of the deceased's estate, with Andika variously claiming to be the son, only son, or dependant of Florence, none of which was supported by evidence. The uncontested testimony established that Andika had no blood relationship with the deceased or Florence, and that his actions were a deliberate ploy to disinherit the true heirs, namely Benina James Machengo and her sons. The failure to disclose the existence of the deceased's lawful heirs and the fraudulent misrepresentation in the petition for letters of administration constituted sufficient grounds for revocation of the grant...
Court Disposition
Application for revocation of grant allowed; grant and registration in respondent's name revoked.
Orders
- The grant of letters of administration issued to Robert Amukmbwa Andika on 20th September 2000 is revoked.
- The registration of Robert Amukmbwa Andika as proprietor of title No. Butsotso/Bukura/250 is nullified and revoked.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA
Succession Cause 475 of 1999
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF ANYOLO MUNYWERE NYENDE :::::::::::::: DECEASED
A N D
ROBERT AMUKMBWA ANDIKA ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: PETITIONER/RESPONDENT
V E R S U S
BENINA JAMES MACHENGO ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: OBJECTOR/APPLICANT
R U L I N G
1. The deceased in this cause, Anyolo Munywere Nyende died on 8th August, 1981 and one Florence Tsisiche by a Petition filed on 7th September, 1999 applied for letters of administration to his estate claiming to be his “daughter”.Apparently she died before a grant of letters of administration was made to her and one Robert Andika sought to be substituted in her place and he claimed to be the “only son” ofFlorenceaforesaid.
2. On 1st August 2000, Andika became the Petitioner in place ofFlorenceby an order of this court and on 20th September 2000, a grant of letters of administration was made out to him.
3. On 15th February 2006, one Benina James Machengo sought to have the grant aforesaid revoked under section 76 of the Law of Succession Act for reasons inter-alia that Andika and Florence were neither beneficiaries nor were they directly related to the deceased. That the latter’s sole intention in filing the present Cause was to disinherit the deceased’s real and lawful heirs.
4. Apparently, Andika actually had obtained a certificate of confirmation of grant and had the deceased’s sole asset i.e. land parcel No. Butsotso/Bukura/250 registered in his name by the time the application to revoke the grant was filed and his response to it was as follows:-
5. Firstly, that the deceased, Anyolo held the above parcel of land in trust for himself and his two brothers, Jacob Amunga and James Ochieng.ThatFlorenceaforesaid was the only daughter of Jacob Amunga and was entitled to her father’s portion of the land.Further that he, Andika, was “a dependant” of Florence Tsisika and was entitled to a share of the estate.
6. Secondly, that Benina, the applicant was originally married to the deceased, Anyolo, but upon his death, she married one James Ochieng and thereafter lost her claim to the estate.
7. At the hearing, only Benina the applicant and her witness, Charles Mache Munwele testified and they stated that Andika was a stranger and a son of one Wefende who had leased the deceased’s land for 3 years and he had no blood relationship with the deceased or even Florence.That although Benina married James Ochieng, brother of the deceased, this was after the deceased had died and that she remained on the deceased’s land.
8. To my mind, the matter presents no difficulty at all, because Andika andFlorencein proceedings prior to the present application styled themselves “son” and “daughter” of the deceased.Later, afterFlorencehad died, Andika claimed to be her “only son” and later again, he claimed to be “her dependant”.He lied in all instances because by the evidence of Beninah and Munywele which is uncontested, infact he had no relationship with the deceased whatsoever.His attempt at claiming the deceased’s land usingFlorencehas been exposed to be a ploy to disinherit Beninah and her sons and he admits that the latter indeed were sons of the deceased but who were never disclosed in the petition byFlorencenor in the subsequent solo proceedings by Andika leading to the deceased’s parcels of land being registered in his sole name.
9. Reading section 66 of the Law of Succession Act, part V of the same Act and section 76 thereof, this is a case for the grant issued on 20th September 2000 to be recalled and revoked.
10. The above being my order, it follows that the registration of Robert Amukambwa Andika on 16th November 2000 as proprietor of title No. Butsotso/Bukura/250 is hereby ordered to be nullified and revoked and the title should revert back to the names of Anyolo Munywere Nyende (deceased) until further orders of this court.
11. The application dated 15th February 2006 is determined in the terms above.
Costs will be in the cause.
Orders accordingly.
Delivered, dated and signed at Kakamega this 15th day of April, 2010
ISAAC LENAOLA
J U D G E