[2013] KEHC 3779 (KLR)
The court found that the plea entered by the appellant was not unequivocal because the facts presented did not sufficiently link him to the offence of theft. The only connection was a reference to communication between the driver and the accused, which was not explained or expounded upon. Furthermore, the court held...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 3779 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Robert Anyole Emmanuel; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 146 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- conviction quashed; sentence set aside; retrial ordered
- Judges
- GO Shikwe
- Legal Topics
- Stealing on Transit, Plea Taking, Conviction Nullity, Retrial Order, Procedural Irregularity
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Anyole Emmanuel
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plea entered by the appellant was unequivocal.
- 2 Whether the facts presented disclosed an offence linking the appellant to the theft.
- 3 Whether the prosecution's cross-examination of the appellant during mitigation was proper.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plea entered by the appellant was not unequivocal because the facts presented did not sufficiently link him to the offence of theft. The only connection was a reference to communication between the driver and the accused, which was not explained or expounded upon. Furthermore, the court held that allowing the prosecution to cross-examine the appellant during mitigation was unprocedural. As a result, the conviction was declared a nullity and the sentence set aside, with an order for retrial before a court of competent jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
conviction quashed; sentence set aside; retrial ordered
Orders
- The conviction of the appellant is declared a nullity.
- The sentence imposed upon the appellant is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
High Court at Mombasa
Criminal Appeal 146 of 2012 [if gte mso 9]><![endif]
(From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No. 1539 of 2012 of the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Mombasa – R. Odenyo (PM))
ROBERT ANYOLE EMMANUEL ………..……….....….…. APPELLANT
- Versus -
REPUBLIC …………………………………………….… RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
The Appellant was convicted and sentenced to eight years imprisonment for the offence of stealing goods on transit contrary to Section 279(c) of the Penal Code.
The particulars are that on the night of 8th and 9th day of May 2012 along the Mombasa – Nairobi Highway within the Republic of Kenya, jointly with others not before the Court stole one motor vehicle Registration No. KAN 553F make Scania with trailer number ZC 0583 loaded with 1 X 40ft container Registration Number TGHU 922516/0 containing 989 pieces of Linglong tyres valued at US dollars 920788 the property of Mandela Auto Spares Ltd while the said goods were on transit from Mombasa to Malaba.
In the present case the charge was read to the Appellant and he is shown to have stated that “It is true.”
The facts were read to him and he is shown to have stated “The facts are correct.”
A perusal of the facts show that the only link to the Appellant is to be found at page 3 line 4-
“Police Officers got into contact with Safaricom Limited and they were able to tap communication between the driver of the lorry and the Accused. Accused was subsequently arrested and charged with this offence.”
The communication between the driver of the lorry and the Accused was not explained and or expounded so as to link the Accused with the offence of theft. The facts as presented did not disclose any offence.
It is also noted that after the Appellant was called upon to mitigate, the prosecution was allowed to cross-examine him. This was after he declined to offer any mitigation. This was unprocedural and uncalled for.
I am not satisfied that the plea was unequivocal. I accordingly declare his conviction a nullity and set aside the sentence imposed upon him and order for a retrial before a Court of competent jurisdiction.
Judgement read and delivered in open Court this 26th day of April, 2013.
M. MUYA
JUDGE
In the presence of:-
Mr. Oyoro for State
Counsel for the Accused - absent
Court clerk – Mr. Musundi