[2013] KEHC 1337 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 1337 (KLR)

The court found that, considering the gravity of the offence of breaking into a building and committing a felony, and upon review of the probation officer's report, the applicant was not suitable for a community service order. There was no sufficient basis to interfere with the conviction or the sentence imposed by...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 1337 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Robert Kipngetich Sanga alias Nondi; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision 253 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Revision
Outcome
application declined; sentence upheld
Judges
B Ongaya
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Revision of Sentence, Breaking and Entering, Community Service Orders
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Revision of Sentence Breaking and Entering Community Service Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robert Kipngetich Sanga alias Nondi

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling on Revision

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is suitable for a community service order instead of imprisonment.
  2. 2 Whether the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court should be revised.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, considering the gravity of the offence of breaking into a building and committing a felony, and upon review of the probation officer's report, the applicant was not suitable for a community service order. There was no sufficient basis to interfere with the conviction or the sentence imposed by the trial court. The application for revision was therefore declined, and the original sentence of four years imprisonment was upheld.

Court Disposition

application declined; sentence upheld

Orders

  • The application for revision is declined.
  • The sentence of four years imprisonment imposed by the trial court is upheld.