[2020] KECA 485 (KLR)
The Court found that the respondents' assertion that the eviction order had already been executed and that the applicants were no longer in occupation of the disputed property was not contested by the applicants. As execution had already taken place, there was nothing left for the Court to stay. The application for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KECA 485 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Robert Mukarani Simiti; Applicant: Joseph Wandaka; Applicant: Fred Wangila; Respondent: Peter Badhia; Respondent: Peter Wekesa; Respondent: Ann Wekesa; Respondent: Dr. Timothy Pierce
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Application 28 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- GG Okwengu, DK Musinga, AK Murgor
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Eviction Orders, Appeals Process, Children's Home Occupation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Mukarani Simiti
Applicant
Joseph Wandaka
Applicant
Fred Wangila
Applicant
Peter Badhia
Respondent
Peter Wekesa
Respondent
Ann Wekesa
Respondent
Dr. Timothy Pierce
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court should grant a stay of execution of the Environment and Land Court's judgment pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the application for stay is rendered moot by the execution of the eviction order.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the respondents' assertion that the eviction order had already been executed and that the applicants were no longer in occupation of the disputed property was not contested by the applicants. As execution had already taken place, there was nothing left for the Court to stay. The application for stay of execution was therefore rendered moot and was dismissed with costs to the respondents.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for stay of execution is dismissed with costs to the respondents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
38 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT ELDORET
(CORAM: OKWENGU, MUSINGA & MURGOR, JJ.A.)
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 28 OF 2020
BETWEEN
ROBERT MUKARANI SIMITI...................................................1ST APPLICANT
JOSEPH WANDAKA...................................................................2ND APPLICANT
FRED WANGILA..........................................................................3RD APPLICANT
AND
PETER BADHIA........................................................................1ST RESPONDENT
PETER WEKESA.....................................................................2ND RESPONDENT
ANN WEKESA..........................................................................3RD RESPONDENT
DR. TIMOTHY PIERCE..........................................................4TH RESPONDENT
(An application for stay of execution of the Judgment and Decree of the Environment
and Land Court of Kenyaat Kitale (E. Obaga, J.) delivered on 8th March, 2017
in ELC No. 103 of 2007. )
RULING OF THE COURT
1. The applicants sought an order for stay of execution of the Court orders made on 13th November 2018 pending hearing and determination of an appeal.
2. In the impugned judgment, the Environment and Land Court at Kitale had ordered that the applicants do vacate the disputed parcels of land known as Kiminini/Kinyoro Block 4/27and28and hand them over to the Trustees of the Faith Centre Children’s Home with immediate effect, failing which they be evicted therefrom.
3. The applicants’ application for stay of execution of the said orders before the trial court was initially dismissed for non-compliance with order 9 rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Rules, but the applicants demonstrated that there was due compliance with the said rule before they filed the application. Subsequently, the initial ruling was reviewed and the application was re-heard but dismissed on its merits. The applicants then preferred an appeal to this Court.
4. The applicants contended that they have an arguable appeal; and that unless the Court orders stay of execution, they shall be evicted from the disputed parcels of land, which would paralyze operations of a Children’s Home thereon, with a population of 234 children, which would render the appeal nugatory.
5. In their replying affidavit, the respondents stated, inter alia, that the eviction order was executed on 9th March 2020 and annexed a copy of the eviction order, whose execution was duly witnessed by the County Police Commander.
6. The respondents further stated that there were no children in the disputed properties; and that the applicants run their own Children’s Home at Kipsongo in the outskirts of Kitale Town where the children are housed.
7. The respondents’ contention that the order sought to be stayed has already been executed and the applicants are no longer in occupation of the disputed property is not contested by the applicants.
8. In the circumstances, there is nothing to stay, execution having already taken place. Consequently, this application is dismissed with costs to the respondents.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 24th day of July ,2020.
HANNAH OKWENGU
...................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
D.K. MUSINGA
...................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
A.K. MURGOR
..................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
Signed
DEPUTY REGISTRAR