[2020] KECA 485 (KLR)

[2020] KECA 485 (KLR)

The Court found that the respondents' assertion that the eviction order had already been executed and that the applicants were no longer in occupation of the disputed property was not contested by the applicants. As execution had already taken place, there was nothing left for the Court to stay. The application for...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KECA 485 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Robert Mukarani Simiti; Applicant: Joseph Wandaka; Applicant: Fred Wangila; Respondent: Peter Badhia; Respondent: Peter Wekesa; Respondent: Ann Wekesa; Respondent: Dr. Timothy Pierce
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 28 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
GG Okwengu, DK Musinga, AK Murgor
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Eviction Orders, Appeals Process, Children's Home Occupation
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Stay of Execution Eviction Orders Appeals Process Children's Home Occupation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robert Mukarani Simiti

Applicant

Joseph Wandaka

Applicant

Fred Wangila

Applicant

Peter Badhia

Respondent

Peter Wekesa

Respondent

Ann Wekesa

Respondent

Dr. Timothy Pierce

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the Court should grant a stay of execution of the Environment and Land Court's judgment pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the application for stay is rendered moot by the execution of the eviction order.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the respondents' assertion that the eviction order had already been executed and that the applicants were no longer in occupation of the disputed property was not contested by the applicants. As execution had already taken place, there was nothing left for the Court to stay. The application for stay of execution was therefore rendered moot and was dismissed with costs to the respondents.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for stay of execution is dismissed with costs to the respondents.