[2021] KECPT 534 (KLR)

[2021] KECPT 534 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the prayer for a temporary injunction was already spent, as interim orders had previously been granted. Regarding the request for account statements, the Tribunal noted that the 1st Respondent had already provided the relevant statements as annexed to the Replying Affidavit. The Tribunal held...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KECPT 534 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Robert Njagi Kimotho; Applicant: Lorna Margeret Kariuki; Respondent: Nawiri Sacco Society Ltd; Respondent: Giant Auctioneers
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 467 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
Application dismissed as spent; costs in the cause; directions for further conduct of the suit issued.
Legal Topics
Account Statement Disclosure, Interlocutory Injunctions, Costs Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Banking and Finance Account Statement Disclosure Interlocutory Injunctions Costs Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robert Njagi Kimotho

Applicant

Lorna Margeret Kariuki

Applicant

Nawiri Sacco Society Ltd

Respondent

Giant Auctioneers

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the 1st Respondent should be compelled to render and deliver true, accurate and correct accounts and statements for the 1st Applicant's current and loan accounts.
  2. 2 Whether the application for temporary injunction is spent.
  3. 3 Who should bear the costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the prayer for a temporary injunction was already spent, as interim orders had previously been granted. Regarding the request for account statements, the Tribunal noted that the 1st Respondent had already provided the relevant statements as annexed to the Replying Affidavit. The Tribunal held that the applicants could have pursued any further disclosure through a notice to produce under Order 11 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules. As such, the substantive prayers in the application were spent. The only remaining issue was costs, which the Tribunal ordered to be in the cause. Directions were given for the parties to file and serve witness statements and documents...

Court Disposition

Application dismissed as spent; costs in the cause; directions for further conduct of the suit issued.

Orders

  • Parties to file and serve witness statements and documents within 30 days.
  • Matter to be mentioned for pre-trial directions on 28/7/21.