[2018] KEELRC 2313 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 2313 (KLR)

The court found that the Claimants, as public officers seconded to the Respondent, were entitled to their salaries and allowances, which the Respondent had unlawfully withheld due to a dispute with the National Government over revenue remittance. The Claimants were not responsible for the revenue collection issue,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 2313 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Robert Njunji Kibuthu and 30 Others; Respondent: County Government of Mombasa
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 65 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Ruling on Application for Mandatory Injunction Pending Hearing of Main Claim
Outcome
Application allowed. Mandatory injunction granted.
Judges
L Ndolo
Legal Topics
Withholding of Salaries, Mandatory Injunction, Public Service Employment, Employee Rights, Interlocutory Relief
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Withholding of Salaries Mandatory Injunction Public Service Employment Employee Rights Interlocutory Relief

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robert Njunji Kibuthu and 30 Others

Applicant

County Government of Mombasa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Ruling on Application for Mandatory Injunction Pending Hearing of Main Claim

  1. 1 Whether the Claimants have established a case for grant of a mandatory injunction at the interlocutory stage.
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent's withholding of salaries and allowances is lawful.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Claimants, as public officers seconded to the Respondent, were entitled to their salaries and allowances, which the Respondent had unlawfully withheld due to a dispute with the National Government over revenue remittance. The Claimants were not responsible for the revenue collection issue, and using them as leverage in the dispute was unacceptable. The court held that the continued withholding of salaries and allowances was a grave violation of the Claimants' rights as employees. The court was persuaded that special circumstances existed to warrant the grant of a mandatory injunction at the interlocutory stage, compelling the Respondent to release all withheld...

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Mandatory injunction granted.

Orders

  • The Respondent is directed to immediately release all withheld salaries and allowances to the Claimants.
  • The Respondent is to continue paying such salaries and allowances as they fall due, pending the hearing and determination of the claim.