[2019] KEELRC 1952 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 1952 (KLR)

The court found that the Claimant was terminated without notice, hearing, or a letter to show cause, contrary to Section 41 of the Employment Act, 2007. The Respondent did not contest the claim or provide any evidence to justify the termination. The court accepted the Claimant's evidence as unchallenged and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELRC 1952 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Robert Ouko Anditi; Respondent: Cornerstone Security Services Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 198 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Claim allowed in part; judgment entered for the Claimant.
Judges
HS Wasilwa
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Terminal Dues, Procedural Fairness, Compensation, Notice Pay
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Terminal Dues Procedural Fairness Compensation Notice Pay

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robert Ouko Anditi

Claimant

Cornerstone Security Services Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the termination of the Claimant was unlawful and unfair.
  2. 2 Whether the Claimant is entitled to terminal dues and compensation for unfair termination.
  3. 3 Whether the Respondent followed due process as required by the Employment Act, 2007.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Claimant was terminated without notice, hearing, or a letter to show cause, contrary to Section 41 of the Employment Act, 2007. The Respondent did not contest the claim or provide any evidence to justify the termination. The court accepted the Claimant's evidence as unchallenged and determined that the termination was both procedurally and substantively unfair. The Claimant was entitled to one month's salary in lieu of notice, accrued leave for one year, gratuity for one year, and compensation for nine months' salary for unfair termination. The court also ordered the issuance of a certificate of service and awarded costs and interest to the Claimant.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed in part; judgment entered for the Claimant.

Orders

  • Respondent to pay Claimant KES 12,000 as one month's salary in lieu of notice.
  • Respondent to pay Claimant KES 12,000 for one year accrued leave.