[2016] KEHC 1033 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 1033 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant, having pleaded guilty and been convicted and sentenced on the same day, had no right of appeal except as to the extent or legality of the sentence under section 348 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant delayed for about four months without providing a good reason for the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 1033 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Robert Psinon; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kapenguria
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Appeal 14 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
AM Githinji
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Plea of Guilty, Right of Appeal, Criminal Sentencing
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Out of Time Plea of Guilty Right of Appeal Criminal Sentencing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robert Psinon

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to leave to appeal out of time after pleading guilty and being convicted and sentenced.
  2. 2 Whether section 348 of the Criminal Procedure Code bars the applicant from appealing after a guilty plea.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant, having pleaded guilty and been convicted and sentenced on the same day, had no right of appeal except as to the extent or legality of the sentence under section 348 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant delayed for about four months without providing a good reason for the delay. The court concluded that the intention to appeal was an afterthought and that the application lacked merit. Consequently, the application for leave to appeal out of time was summarily rejected and dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal out of time is summarily rejected and dismissed.
  • Ruling to be served upon the applicant and the office of ODPP.