[2017] KEELRC 698 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 698 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant was dismissed on 20.07.2010 and filed the suit on 20.01.2014, which was beyond the three-year limitation period prescribed by section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007. As a result, the suit was time-barred and could not be considered on its merits. The respondent's failure to defend...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELRC 698 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Robert Wambugu Maitho; Respondent: Safari Tingting (K) Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 17 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
suit dismissed as time-barred
Judges
B Ongaya
Legal Topics
Limitation Periods, Unlawful Termination, Severance Pay, Notice Pay
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Limitation Periods Unlawful Termination Severance Pay Notice Pay

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robert Wambugu Maitho

Claimant

Safari Tingting (K) Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant's suit was filed within the statutory limitation period under section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought for alleged unlawful termination.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant was dismissed on 20.07.2010 and filed the suit on 20.01.2014, which was beyond the three-year limitation period prescribed by section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007. As a result, the suit was time-barred and could not be considered on its merits. The respondent's failure to defend the suit did not alter the legal position regarding limitation. The court therefore dismissed the suit with no orders as to costs.

Court Disposition

suit dismissed as time-barred

Orders

  • The suit is hereby dismissed with no orders on costs.