[2021] KEBPRT 195 (KLR)

[2021] KEBPRT 195 (KLR)

The tribunal found that the tenancy in question is a controlled tenancy under Cap 301, as there was no written agreement provided. The landlord's notice to terminate the tenancy, dated 25th March 2021, did not comply with the statutory requirements of section 4(2) and 4(5) of Cap 301, as it was not in the prescribed...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEBPRT 195 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Robert Wanyonyi Wopicho; Respondent: Walter Weswa Mulombi
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case E005 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Landlord's Application for Leave to Levy Distress and Eviction
Outcome
Application partly allowed; leave to levy distress for rent granted, eviction declined.
Legal Topics
Controlled Tenancy, Distress for Rent, Eviction Procedure, Tenancy Notices
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Controlled Tenancy Distress for Rent Eviction Procedure Tenancy Notices

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robert Wanyonyi Wopicho

Applicant

Walter Weswa Mulombi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Landlord's Application for Leave to Levy Distress and Eviction

  1. 1 Whether the landlord is entitled to levy distress for rent arrears against the tenant.
  2. 2 Whether the landlord is entitled to evict the tenant and re-enter the premises under a controlled tenancy.
  3. 3 Whether the notice issued by the landlord to terminate the tenancy complies with the requirements of Cap 301.

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the tenancy in question is a controlled tenancy under Cap 301, as there was no written agreement provided. The landlord's notice to terminate the tenancy, dated 25th March 2021, did not comply with the statutory requirements of section 4(2) and 4(5) of Cap 301, as it was not in the prescribed form and lacked necessary details. Consequently, the prayer for eviction was declined, as granting it would amount to an unlawful termination of a controlled tenancy. However, the landlord's claim for rent arrears was unchallenged, and the tribunal was satisfied that the tenant was in arrears for at least six months. Therefore, the tribunal granted the landlord leave to levy...

Court Disposition

Application partly allowed; leave to levy distress for rent granted, eviction declined.

Orders

  • The landlord/applicant is granted leave to levy distress for rent arrears owing as at the date of this ruling.
  • The prayer for eviction against the tenant is declined.