[2019] KEHC 11162 (KLR)
The court found that the application for stay of execution was made without unreasonable delay, as it was filed within a week of the lower court's judgment. The applicant expressed a reasonable fear that the respondent may not be able to refund the decretal sum if the appeal succeeds, and the respondent did not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 11162 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Robert Waweru Maina t/a Auntique Auctions Limited; Respondent: Hussein Pothiwalla
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 267 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Stay Application
- Outcome
- Stay of execution granted on condition of deposit of decretal sum.
- Judges
- BT Jaden
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Security for Due Performance, Substantial Loss, Appeal Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Waweru Maina t/a Auntique Auctions Limited
Applicant
Hussein Pothiwalla
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Stay Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has satisfied the conditions for grant of stay of execution pending appeal under Order 42 rule 6(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010.
- 2 Whether the applicant will suffer substantial loss if stay is not granted.
- 3 Whether the respondent's ability to refund the decretal sum has been sufficiently challenged.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the application for stay of execution was made without unreasonable delay, as it was filed within a week of the lower court's judgment. The applicant expressed a reasonable fear that the respondent may not be able to refund the decretal sum if the appeal succeeds, and the respondent did not provide evidence to dispel this concern. Applying the principle that the evidential burden shifts to the respondent in such circumstances, the court determined that the applicant had satisfied the requirements for stay of execution under Order 42 rule 6(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules. To balance the interests of both parties, the court granted a conditional stay of execution...
Court Disposition
Stay of execution granted on condition of deposit of decretal sum.
Orders
- Stay of execution of the judgment/decree in CMCC No.5019 of 2013 Milimani Commercial Courts is granted pending appeal, on condition that the applicant deposits the decretal sum in an interest earning bank account of the counsels for the parties or in court within 30 days from the date hereof.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CIVIL DIVISION
HIGH COURT CIVIL APPEAL NO. 267 OF 2018
ROBERT WAWERU MAINA t/a
AUNTIQUE AUCTIONS LIMITE...............................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
HUSSEIN POTHIWALLA.........................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The application dated 17th June, 2018 seeks orders that this honourable court be pleased to order a stay of execution on the Judgment/Decree CMCC No.5019 of 2013 Milimani Commercial Courts entered against the Appellant by the honourable trial court on the 11th June, pending the appeal.
2. It is stated in the grounds and the affidavit in support that judgment was entered for the Respondent against the Applicant in the sum of Ksh.200,000/= and the Applicant’s Counter-claim dismissed with costs. The Applicant is dissatisfied with the said judgment and has filed an appeal. The Applicant has expressed apprehension that if execution proceeds he stands to suffer irreparably and the appeal rendered nugatory as it may not be possible to recover the decretal sum from the Respondent. The Applicant is willing to furnish security for the due performance of the decree by depositing half of the principal amount.
3. The application is opposed. It is stated in the replying affidavit that the Respondent is entitled to the fruits of the judgment and that it has not been shown that he is not capable of refunding the decretal sum. That half the decretal sum be paid to him.
4. The application was disposed of by way of written submissions which I have considered.
5. Order 42 rule 6 (2) of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010 provides as follows:
“No order for stay of execution shall be made under sub-rule (1) unless –
(a) The court is satisfied that substantial loss may result to the applicant unless the order is made and that the application has been made without unreasonable delay; and
(b) Such security as the court orders for the due performance of such decree or order as may ultimately be binding on him has been given by the applicant.”
6. The judgment of the lower court was delivered on 11th June, 2018. The application at hand was filed on 18th June, 2018. There was no unreasonable delay.
7. The Applicant has averred that the Respondent may not be capable of refunding the decretal sum. The Respondent has not said anything to dispel this fear. As stated by the Court of Appeal in the case of Nrb Civil Application 238 of 2005 (UR 144/2005) National Industrial Credit Bank Ltd -Vs- Aquinas Francis Wasike & Another:
“This court has said before and it would bear repeating that while the legal duty is on an applicant to prove the allegation that an appeal would be rendered nugatory because a respondent would be unable to pay back the decretal sum, it is unreasonable to expect such an applicant to know in detail the resources owned by a respondent or the lack of them. Once an applicant expresses a reasonable fear that a respondent would be unable to pay back the decretal sum, the evidential burden must then shift to the respondent to show what resources he has since that is a matter which is peculiarly within his knowledge – see for example section 112 of the Evidence Act, Chapter 80 Laws of Kenya.”
8. To balance the competing interest of both parties, I allow stay of execution pending appeal on condition that the Applicant do deposit the decretal sum in an interest earning bank account of the counsels for the parties herein or in court within 30 days from the date hereof.
Dated, signed and delivered in Nairobi this 12th day of March, 2019
B. THURANIRA JADEN
JUDGE