[2017] KEHC 3256 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 3256 (KLR)

The court found that there was no legal basis to interfere with or review the sentence imposed by the trial court. The sentence was deemed lawful, and no error or illegality was demonstrated by the applicant. Accordingly, the application for review was declined.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 3256 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Robi Lesengei; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nanyuki
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision 128 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Outcome
application for review declined
Legal Topics
Sentence Review, Criminal Revision, Trial Court Sentence
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentence Review Criminal Revision Trial Court Sentence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robi Lesengei

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there is a basis to review the sentence imposed by the trial court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was no legal basis to interfere with or review the sentence imposed by the trial court. The sentence was deemed lawful, and no error or illegality was demonstrated by the applicant. Accordingly, the application for review was declined.

Court Disposition

application for review declined

Orders

  • The application for review is declined.