[2008] KEHC 2773 (KLR)
The court found that the only objection raised by the respondent was procedural, relating to the date of the affidavit, and not on the merits of the application. The court held that, pursuant to Order XVIII rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Rules, the earlier dating of the affidavit does not invalidate the application....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] KEHC 2773 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Robinson Mwangi Njuguna; Respondent: Nelson Gachihi Gichimu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application 187 of 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- MM Kasango
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeals Out of Time, Affidavit Requirements
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robinson Mwangi Njuguna
Applicant
Nelson Gachihi Gichimu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time against the judgment of the Senior Resident Magistrate's Court.
- 2 Whether the dating of the supporting affidavit prior to the application invalidates the application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the only objection raised by the respondent was procedural, relating to the date of the affidavit, and not on the merits of the application. The court held that, pursuant to Order XVIII rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Rules, the earlier dating of the affidavit does not invalidate the application. Since there was no opposition on the merits and the applicant had provided a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the appeal, the court exercised its discretion to grant leave to file the appeal out of time.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- Leave is granted to the applicant to file his appeal against the judgment of Senior Resident Magistrate’s Civil Case No. 24 of 2006 Kigumo delivered on 23rd August 2007 out of time, to be filed within 21 days from the date hereof.
- Costs of the Notice of Motion dated 16th November 2007 to abide with the outcome of the proposed appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.187 OF 2007
ROBINSON MWANGI NJUGUNA…….......…………….. APPLICANT
VERSUS
NELSON GACHIHI GICHIMU ……………..…………. RESPONDENT
RULING
The application before court is dated 16th November 2007. The application seeks that the court to grant leave to the applicant to file the appeal out of time. The proposed appeal is in respect of the judgment of Senior Resident Magistrate Civil Case No. 24 of 2006 Kigumo Court. The applicant argued that he was not satisfied with the Lower Court’s judgment which was delivered on 23rd August 2007. Accordingly he applied for proceedings and paid for the same on 3rd September 2007. Thereafter he kept visiting the registry with a view to checking whether the proceedings were ready. On 28th October 2007 he was asked to make a further payment for the proceedings of Kshs.420/-. By the time the proceedings were availed to him the period for filing an appeal had expired. He stated that his advocate on perusal of the proceedings has advised him that he has overwhelming chances of success in the intended appeal. The application was opposed only on the basis that the date of the affidavit in support of the application was some days before the date of the application. The application is dated 16th November 2007 and the affidavit is dated 14th November 2007. The simple response to that argument is that the dating on an earlier date of the affidavit does not defeat the application. Order XVIII rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Rules provides as follows;-
“Unless otherwise directed by the court an affidavit shall not be rejected solely because it was sworn before the filing of the suit concerned.”
Since the only objection raised was in regard to the date of the affidavit, the application is not opposed on merits. I find that the same is merited and I do hereby grant the following prayers;-
1. That the court does hereby grant leave to the applicant to file his appeal against the judgment of Senior Resident Magistrate’s Civil Case No. 24 of 2006 Kigumo delivered on 23rd August 2007 out of time. The applicant shall file such appeal within 21 days from the date hereof.
2. The court orders that the costs of the Notice of Motion dated 16th November 2007 do abide with the outcome of the proposed appeal.
Dated and delivered at Nyeri this 22nd day of April 2008.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE