[2014] KEHC 8499 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 8499 (KLR)

The court found that the petition did not raise issues concerning fundamental rights of employees, conditions or terms of employment, or labour relations. Instead, it raised questions about the exercise of administrative powers in appointments under the County Government Act. Since those appointed were not parties...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 8499 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Robinson Naleng’oyo ole Torome; Respondent: The Narok County Public Service Board; Respondent: The County Government of Narok
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 13 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Jurisdiction
Outcome
Petition transferred to the High Court, Nakuru for hearing and determination. Costs of the objection awarded to the Petitioner.
Judges
MSA Makhandia
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Courts, County Government Recruitment, Administrative Action Review
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Administrative Law Jurisdiction of Courts County Government Recruitment Administrative Action Review

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robinson Naleng’oyo ole Torome

Applicant

The Narok County Public Service Board

Respondent

The County Government of Narok

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Jurisdiction

  1. 1 Whether the Industrial Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine disputes relating to the recruitment and appointment of county administrators under the County Government Act.
  2. 2 Whether the petition raises issues of employment and labour relations or administrative action subject to the High Court's jurisdiction.
  3. 3 Whether the Respondents failed to comply with court orders regarding filing and service of submissions.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the petition did not raise issues concerning fundamental rights of employees, conditions or terms of employment, or labour relations. Instead, it raised questions about the exercise of administrative powers in appointments under the County Government Act. Since those appointed were not parties to the proceedings and the dispute was not between employer and employee, the Industrial Court lacked jurisdiction. The proper forum for such a dispute is the High Court. The court relied on the Court of Appeal decision in Daniel N. Mugendi v Kenyatta University & 3 others, which held that matters filed in the wrong forum should be transferred to the appropriate court. The court...

Court Disposition

Petition transferred to the High Court, Nakuru for hearing and determination. Costs of the objection awarded to the Petitioner.

Orders

  • The Petition is transferred to the High Court, Nakuru for hearing and determination.
  • The Respondents shall pay the Petitioner’s costs of the objection for failure to comply with court orders on filing and service of submissions.