[2020] KEHC 8972 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 8972 (KLR)

The court found that the 2nd garnishee held no funds for the judgment debtor and the 3rd garnishee's funds were already attached by a prior order, thus no further attachment could be made. The 1st garnishee, DTB Bank Limited, failed to respond or dispute liability after being served, and therefore the garnishee...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 8972 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Robson Harris & Company Advocates; Respondent: Invesco Assurance Company Limited; Garnishee: DTB Bank Limited; Garnishee: Cooperative Bank Limited; Garnishee: Family Bank Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Case E196 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Garnishee Order Nisi
Outcome
Garnishee order nisi made absolute against 1st garnishee; discharged as to 2nd and 3rd garnishees; costs awarded to 2nd and 3rd garnishees.
Judges
DAS Majanja
Legal Topics
Garnishee Proceedings, Enforcement of Judgments, Decretal Amounts
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Garnishee Proceedings Enforcement of Judgments Decretal Amounts

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robson Harris & Company Advocates

Applicant

Invesco Assurance Company Limited

Respondent

DTB Bank Limited

Garnishee

Cooperative Bank Limited

Garnishee

Family Bank Limited

Garnishee

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Garnishee Order Nisi

  1. 1 Whether the garnishee order nisi against the three banks should be made absolute.
  2. 2 Whether the 2nd and 3rd garnishees hold funds for the judgment debtor that can be attached.
  3. 3 Whether costs should be awarded to the 2nd and 3rd garnishees.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the 2nd garnishee held no funds for the judgment debtor and the 3rd garnishee's funds were already attached by a prior order, thus no further attachment could be made. The 1st garnishee, DTB Bank Limited, failed to respond or dispute liability after being served, and therefore the garnishee order nisi against it was made absolute. Costs were awarded to the 2nd and 3rd garnishees due to their successful opposition to the attachment.

Court Disposition

Garnishee order nisi made absolute against 1st garnishee; discharged as to 2nd and 3rd garnishees; costs awarded to 2nd and 3rd garnishees.

Orders

  • Garnishee order nisi against DTB Bank Limited is made absolute.
  • Garnishee order nisi against Cooperative Bank Limited and Family Bank Limited is discharged.