[2016] KEELRC 658 (KLR)

[2016] KEELRC 658 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant's contract of service was terminated by his own letter dated 05.01.2011. The suit was filed on 06.03.2014, after the three-year limitation period prescribed by section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007, had lapsed on or about 05.01.2014. Therefore, the suit was time barred and could...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEELRC 658 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Rogers Mutisya; Respondent: Chieni Plains Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 36 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
claim dismissed as time barred
Judges
B Ongaya
Legal Topics
Limitation of Actions, Unlawful Termination, Employment Contracts
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Limitation of Actions Unlawful Termination Employment Contracts

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rogers Mutisya

Claimant

Chieni Plains Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the claimant's suit was time barred under section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007.
  2. 2 Whether the termination of the claimant's employment was unlawful.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant's contract of service was terminated by his own letter dated 05.01.2011. The suit was filed on 06.03.2014, after the three-year limitation period prescribed by section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007, had lapsed on or about 05.01.2014. Therefore, the suit was time barred and could not be entertained by the court. The preliminary objection raised by the respondent was upheld, resulting in the dismissal of the claimant's memorandum of claim with costs.

Court Disposition

claim dismissed as time barred

Orders

  • The preliminary objection filed for the respondent on 09.08.2015 is upheld.
  • The claimant’s memorandum of claim as amended on 8.06.2015 is dismissed with costs.