[2018] KEELC 3845 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 3845 (KLR)

The court found that the appellant failed to set down the appeal for hearing within one year after service of the memorandum of appeal, as required by Order 45 Rule 35(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules. The appeal remained unprosecuted for nearly 10 years, demonstrating clear inaction by the appellant. In these...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 3845 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Roland Mbuba Mukingo; Respondent: Lucy Karimi Mucioka
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal 2 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
appeal dismissed for want of prosecution
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Appeals Process, Costs Award
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Appeals Process Costs Award

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Roland Mbuba Mukingo

Appellant

Lucy Karimi Mucioka

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to inaction by the appellant.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent is entitled to costs upon dismissal of the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant failed to set down the appeal for hearing within one year after service of the memorandum of appeal, as required by Order 45 Rule 35(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules. The appeal remained unprosecuted for nearly 10 years, demonstrating clear inaction by the appellant. In these circumstances, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and awarded costs to the respondent.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed for want of prosecution

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
  • Costs are awarded to the respondent.