[2019] KEELRC 2322 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 2322 (KLR)

The court found that while the Respondent complied with procedural fairness by issuing a show cause letter and allowing the Claimant to respond, it failed to prove valid and fair reasons for the termination as required by law. The Respondent did not present any evidence or witness to substantiate the allegations...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELRC 2322 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Ronald Gideon Eshitera; Respondent: Metal Crowns Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1816 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Claim partly allowed; termination declared unfair; compensation awarded.
Judges
MSA Makhandia
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Procedural Fairness, Substantive Fairness, Compensation for Unfair Dismissal
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Procedural Fairness Substantive Fairness Compensation for Unfair Dismissal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ronald Gideon Eshitera

Claimant

Metal Crowns Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the termination of the Claimant's employment was procedurally and substantively fair.
  2. 2 Whether the Claimant is entitled to compensation for unfair termination.
  3. 3 Whether the Claimant is entitled to overtime pay, salary arrears, and trade union dues.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that while the Respondent complied with procedural fairness by issuing a show cause letter and allowing the Claimant to respond, it failed to prove valid and fair reasons for the termination as required by law. The Respondent did not present any evidence or witness to substantiate the allegations against the Claimant. The Claimant's explanation regarding the alleged gas shortage was unrebutted. Consequently, the termination was held to be substantively unfair. The court dismissed claims for overtime, salary arrears, and trade union dues due to lack of evidence. Considering the Claimant's length of service, the court awarded compensation equivalent to four months' gross...

Court Disposition

Claim partly allowed; termination declared unfair; compensation awarded.

Orders

  • The Respondent shall pay the Claimant Kshs 243,588 as compensation for unfair termination.
  • The Claimant is awarded costs on half scale.