[2017] KEHC 645 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 645 (KLR)

The court held that once an appeal has been heard and determined, the same matter cannot be revisited by way of revision. The applicant, having had his appeal dismissed, cannot use the revision process as a substitute for a further appeal. The proper legal avenue available to the applicant is to file an appeal...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 645 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Ronald Kibet Sang; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Bomet
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision 9 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
GO Shikwe
Legal Topics
Criminal Revision, Appellate Jurisdiction, Stealing Offences
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Criminal Revision Appellate Jurisdiction Stealing Offences

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ronald Kibet Sang

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the High Court can entertain a revision application after an appeal on the same matter has been dismissed.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has exhausted the proper appellate process.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that once an appeal has been heard and determined, the same matter cannot be revisited by way of revision. The applicant, having had his appeal dismissed, cannot use the revision process as a substitute for a further appeal. The proper legal avenue available to the applicant is to file an appeal before the Court of Appeal, not to seek revision in the High Court. Accordingly, the application for revision was dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for revision is dismissed.
  • A copy of the ruling to be served on the parties.