[2017] KEHC 4140 (KLR)
The court found that by conceding the respondent was not the employer, the claimant admitted there was no employment relationship between the parties. As a result, no cause of action could be maintained against the respondent. The court held that the memorandum of claim was unsustainable and that introducing a third...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 4140 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Ronald Luvisia Masinde; Respondent: Eldoret Grains Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 187 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Ruling on Motion to Strike Out Claim and Third Party Notice
- Outcome
- Claim struck out with costs to the respondent; costs to be borne personally by the claimant's advocate.
- Judges
- MSA Makhandia
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Termination, Proper Parties, Third Party Procedure, Costs Award
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ronald Luvisia Masinde
Claimant
Eldoret Grains Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Motion to Strike Out Claim and Third Party Notice
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was unlawfully, unprocedurally and unfairly terminated from employment by the respondent.
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to compensation for unlawful, unprocedural and unfair termination as prayed for in the memorandum of claim.
- 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to an award of a certificate of service.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that by conceding the respondent was not the employer, the claimant admitted there was no employment relationship between the parties. As a result, no cause of action could be maintained against the respondent. The court held that the memorandum of claim was unsustainable and that introducing a third party would only complicate already confused pleadings. The proper course was to strike out the claim with costs to the respondent, and the costs were to be borne personally by the claimant's advocate due to the improper filing and confusion caused.
Court Disposition
Claim struck out with costs to the respondent; costs to be borne personally by the claimant's advocate.
Orders
- The memorandum(s) of claim presented herein are struck out with costs to the respondent.
- The costs are to be borne personally by the claimant(s) advocate on record.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
34 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT ELDORET
CAUSE NO. 187 OF 2017
(Originally Nakuru Cause No. 396 of 2016)
RONALD LUVISIA MASINDE................................................CLAIMANT
VERSUS
ELDORET GRAINS LIMITED...........................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The Claimant instituted legal proceedings against the Respondent on 7 October 2016 and the issues in dispute were stated as
a. whether the claimant was unlawfully, unprocedurally and unfairly terminated from employment by the respondent;
b. whether the claimant is entitled to compensation for unlawful, unprocedural and unfair termination from the employment as prayed for in the memorandum of claim;
c. whether the claimant is entitled to an award of a certificate of service;
d. Who should pay costs and interests of the suit.
2. In an unprecedented practice, the law firm of Mwakio, Kirwa & Co. Advocates also annexed to the Memorandum of Claim other Memorandum(s) of Claims containing pleadings in respect of Philip Maina v Eldoret Grains Ltd, Benson Aswani Senelwa v Eldoret Grains Ltd, Kizito Warukoi v Eldoret Grains Ltd, Wyclife Mukwana Wekesa v Eldoret Grains Ltd, Samson Lumasayi Mamba v Eldoret Grains Ltd, Collins Wanjala Wamacho v Eldoret Grains Ltd and Peter Kipchirchir v Eldoret Grains Ltd.
3. Appropriate filing fees for these other pleadings were not paid nor were Cause numbers allocated to them. The Notice of Summons issued however indicated these other Causes as part of Cause No. 396 of 2016.
4. To all intents and purposes these purported Claims are invalid and are struck out.
5. On 17 March 2017, the firm of Kitiwa & Co. Advocates, acting for the Respondent filed a Notice of Motion seeking
a). The Respondent be granted leave to issue a third party notice to Ready Consultancy Company Ltd of P.O. Box 99734 Mombasa.
b). Costs of this application be in the cause.
6. The motion was anchored on the ground that the Respondent was not the employer of the Claimant(s) and that the Claimant(s) were instead the employees of the intended third party, Ready Consultancy Limited.
7. When the motion came up on 27 April 2017, Mr. Kariuki for the Claimant(s) informed the Court that the motion was not opposed.
8. The legal implication of the Claimant(s) conceding the motion is that they were admitting that the Respondent was not their employer and therefore no cause of action accruing out of an employment relationship could be maintained against it.
9. In the view of the Court, having conceded that the wrong party was sued, the instant Memorandum of Claim cannot be sustained through third party notice or proceedings.
10. That approach can only muddy the already confused pleadings presented to Court.
11. The Court therefore orders that the Memorandum(s) of Claim(s) presented herein be struck out with costs to the Respondent.
12. The costs should be borne personally by the Claimant(s) advocate on record.
13. And because the cause(s) of action advanced herein accrued in Eldoret, this file should be allocated a new number and archived in Eldoret sub-registry of the Court.
Delivered, dated and signed in Eldoret on this 28th day of July 2017.
Radido Stephen
Judge
Appearances
For Claimant Mr. Kariuki instructed by Mwakio, Kirwa & Co. Advocates
For Respondent Ms. Lusweti instructed by Kitiwa & Co. Advocates
Court Assistant Nixon/Martin