[2013] KEHC 4860 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff had demonstrated a prima facie case with a probability of success, given her long-standing occupation and use of the disputed land, and the contradictory positions taken by the defendants regarding her possession. The court further held that the plaintiff and her family would likely suffer irreparable harm through eviction if the injunction was not granted. The balance of convenience also favoured the plaintiff, as the defendants' statements were inconsistent as to when the plaintiff came into possession. Accordingly, the court granted a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's occupation, pending the...
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 4860 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Rosa Moraa Onsarigo; Defendant: The Chairman, School Committee, Nyangweta D.O.K. Primary School; Defendant: The Clerk, The County Council of Gusii
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2013
- Case Number
- Civil Case 63 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Interlocutory Application for Injunction Pending Hearing of Originating Summons
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's application for temporary injunction allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Injunctive Relief, Limitation of Actions, Land Ownership Disputes
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rosa Moraa Onsarigo
Plaintiff
The Chairman, School Committee, Nyangweta D.O.K. Primary School
Defendant
The Clerk, The County Council of Gusii
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Interlocutory Application for Injunction Pending Hearing of Originating Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff has established a prima facie case with a probability of success for grant of an interlocutory injunction.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff is likely to suffer irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted.
- 3 Whether the balance of convenience favours the grant of an injunction to the plaintiff.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had demonstrated a prima facie case with a probability of success, given her long-standing occupation and use of the disputed land, and the contradictory positions taken by the defendants regarding her possession. The court further held that the plaintiff and her family would likely suffer irreparable harm through eviction if the injunction was not granted. The balance of convenience also favoured the plaintiff, as the defendants' statements were inconsistent as to when the plaintiff came into possession. Accordingly, the court granted a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's occupation, pending the...
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's application for temporary injunction allowed.
Orders
- A temporary order of injunction is granted restraining the defendants, their agents, servants, assigns, or any other persons from interfering with, trespassing into, tilling, dealing with, or evicting the plaintiff, her agents, servants, assigns, family members, or relatives from the portion of land measuring...
- Costs of the application shall await the outcome of the main suit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment