[2020] KEELRC 1499 (KLR)
The court found that the claimant failed to prove her claim for overtime compensation to the required standard. Although she filed an overtime form bearing her name, she did not make any attempt to link the contents of the form with the figures stated in her claim. The court emphasized that special damages must be...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEELRC 1499 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Rosejeddy Achieng Odede; Respondent: China Dalian International Economic & Technical Group Ltd Bachuma Gate Project; Interested Party: CAS Consultant Engineering Ltd
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 133 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- claim dismissed
- Judges
- L Ndolo
- Legal Topics
- Overtime Compensation, Special Damages, Burden of Proof, Employment Relationship
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rosejeddy Achieng Odede
Claimant
China Dalian International Economic & Technical Group Ltd Bachuma Gate Project
Respondent
CAS Consultant Engineering Ltd
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to overtime compensation for the specified periods.
- 2 Whether the claimant proved her claim for special damages to the required legal standard.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claimant failed to prove her claim for overtime compensation to the required standard. Although she filed an overtime form bearing her name, she did not make any attempt to link the contents of the form with the figures stated in her claim. The court emphasized that special damages must be specifically pleaded and strictly proved, and the claimant did not meet this threshold. As a result, the claim for overtime compensation failed and was dismissed.
Court Disposition
claim dismissed
Orders
- The claim is dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
34 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT MOMBASA
CAUSE NO 133 OF 2018
ROSEJEDDY ACHIENG ODEDE........................................................................CLAIMANT
VS
CHINA DALIAN INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC
& TECHNICAL GROUP LTD BACHUMA GATE PROJECT....................RESPONDENT
AND
CAS CONSULTANT ENGINEERING LTD......................................INTERESTED PARTY
JUDGMENT
Introduction
1. By a Statement of Claim dated 9th March 2018 and filed in court on 14th March 2018, the Claimant seeks payment of overtime compensation in the sum of Kshs. 48,859.
2. Neither the Respondent nor the Interested Party filed a response. The matter therefore proceeded by way of formal proof.
The Claimant’s Case
3. The Claimant states that she was employed by the Interested Party in February 2015 in the position of Laboratory Attendant. The Claimant adds that the Interested Party was a consultant in the Maji ya Chumvi-Bachuma Gate Road Project, where the Respondent was a contractor.
4. The Claimant avers that there was an arrangement between the Respondent and Interested Party that the Interested Party would pay the Claimant’s salary component for normal working hours from 8. 00 am to 5. 00 pm. Under this arrangement, the Respondent was responsible for paying the Claimant for any overtime worked.
5. The Claimant states that the Respondent had paid her overtime save for the months of April/May 2017 and September/October 2017. The Claimant therefore lays a claim for overtime dues as follows:
a) April-May 2017: 241 hours @ Kshs. 139………..…………........….Kshs. 29,746
b) September-October 2017: 137. 5 hours @ Kshs. 139 ….………..........19,113
Total……………………………………………………………………………….......…..48,859
6. The Claimant further asks for costs plus interest.
Findings and Determination
7. The Claimant’s claim in this case is for overtime compensation which falls within the category of special damages.
8. In John Richard Okuku Oloo v South Nyanza Sugar Co. Ltd [2013] eKLR, the Court of Appeal restated the well-grounded principle that special damages must be specifically pleaded and proved with a degree of certainty and particularity.
9. In this case all the Claimant did was to file a copy of overtime form bearing her name. She however made no attempt to link the contents of the form with the figures stated in her claim.
10. Overall, the Claimant did not prove her claim to the required standard. The claim therefore fails and is dismissed.
11. I make no order for costs.
12. Orders accordingly.
DATED SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MOMBASA THIS 27TH DAY FEBRUARY 2020
LINNET NDOLO
JUDGE
Appearance:
Mr. Muchiri for the Claimant
No appearance for the Respondent