[2017] KEELC 1203 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 1203 (KLR)

The court found that the Plaintiff is the registered owner of the suit land, Kisumu/Nyalunya/3655, as evidenced by the green card and supporting sale agreements. The Defendant did not present any substantive challenge to the Plaintiff's title in accordance with the law. Under Section 26 of the Land Registration Act,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 1203 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Roselyne E Okumu; Defendant: Dorine Aluoch Adhiambo
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 161 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Temporary Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
Application allowed. Temporary injunction confirmed. Costs to the Plaintiff.
Legal Topics
Temporary Injunctions, Land Title Registration, Prima Facie Case, Ownership Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Temporary Injunctions Land Title Registration Prima Facie Case Ownership Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Roselyne E Okumu

Plaintiff

Dorine Aluoch Adhiambo

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Temporary Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiff has established a prima facie case with a probability of success to warrant the grant of a temporary injunction.
  2. 2 Who should bear the costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Plaintiff is the registered owner of the suit land, Kisumu/Nyalunya/3655, as evidenced by the green card and supporting sale agreements. The Defendant did not present any substantive challenge to the Plaintiff's title in accordance with the law. Under Section 26 of the Land Registration Act, the Plaintiff's title is absolute and indefeasible unless successfully challenged, which had not occurred. The Plaintiff therefore established a prima facie case with a probability of success, justifying the grant of a temporary injunction to preserve the status quo pending the hearing and determination of the suit. The interim orders previously granted were confirmed, and...

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Temporary injunction confirmed. Costs to the Plaintiff.

Orders

  • Temporary injunction restraining the Defendant from trespassing, building, interring remains, or otherwise interfering with land parcel Kisumu/Nyalunya/3655 pending determination of the suit.
  • Costs of the application awarded to the Plaintiff.