[2019] KEELC 4001 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 4001 (KLR)

The court found that the orders made by Honourable Arome (Resident Magistrate) on 30th August 2018 were null and void because the magistrate was not designated to hear environment and land matters as required by Section 26(3) and (4) of the Environment and Land Court Act. Furthermore, the judgment was entered in a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 4001 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Rosemary Atieno Mbogo; Defendant: Rose Atieno Juma; Defendant: Charles Orwa Oyombe; Defendant: John Okuku Oyombe; Defendant: Martin Adera Oyombe; Defendant: Stephen Ochieng
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Migori
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 5 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Review of Subordinate Court Orders
Outcome
orders of 30th August 2018 set aside; suit to be heard afresh by designated magistrate
Legal Topics
Eviction Orders, Jurisdiction of Magistrates, Review of Judgments, Designation of Courts
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Eviction Orders Jurisdiction of Magistrates Review of Judgments Designation of Courts

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rosemary Atieno Mbogo

Plaintiff

Rose Atieno Juma

Defendant

Charles Orwa Oyombe

Defendant

John Okuku Oyombe

Defendant

Martin Adera Oyombe

Defendant

Stephen Ochieng

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Review of Subordinate Court Orders

  1. 1 Whether the orders made by Honourable Arome (Resident Magistrate) on 30th August 2018 in Ndhiwa SRMCC No. 397 of 2017 were valid and lawful.
  2. 2 Whether the magistrate who issued the orders had jurisdiction under the Environment and Land Court Act and the Land Act.
  3. 3 Whether the procedure for entering judgment in a non-liquidated claim was properly followed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the orders made by Honourable Arome (Resident Magistrate) on 30th August 2018 were null and void because the magistrate was not designated to hear environment and land matters as required by Section 26(3) and (4) of the Environment and Land Court Act. Furthermore, the judgment was entered in a claim that was not a liquidated demand, contrary to the requirements of Order 10 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The court emphasized that jurisdiction is fundamental and any proceedings conducted without it are a nullity. Consequently, the orders were set aside and the matter was directed to be heard afresh by a properly designated magistrate.

Court Disposition

orders of 30th August 2018 set aside; suit to be heard afresh by designated magistrate

Orders

  • The orders made on 30th August 2018 by Honourable Arome (Resident Magistrate) in Ndhiwa Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court Civil Case No. 397 of 2017 are hereby set aside.
  • The suit shall be heard and determined without delay by a designated magistrate at Ndhiwa Principal Magistrate’s Court.