[2001] KECA 59 (KLR)
The Court of Appeal determined that the appellant had not been served with notice of the appeal. In the absence of proper service, the court could not proceed with the hearing of the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was stood over generally to allow for proper service to be effected. This decision upholds the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2001] KECA 59 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Rosemary Mwinga; Respondent: Godfrey Mahinda Mugure Mahinda
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 119 of 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Order on Service of Appeal
- Outcome
- The appeal was stood over generally due to lack of service on the appellant.
- Legal Topics
- Service of Process, Adjournment of Hearing
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rosemary Mwinga
Appellant
Godfrey Mahinda Mugure Mahinda
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Order on Service of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was properly served with notice of the appeal hearing.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal determined that the appellant had not been served with notice of the appeal. In the absence of proper service, the court could not proceed with the hearing of the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was stood over generally to allow for proper service to be effected. This decision upholds the fundamental principle of natural justice that requires all parties to be given adequate notice and an opportunity to be heard before any adverse orders are made against them.
Court Disposition
The appeal was stood over generally due to lack of service on the appellant.
Orders
- The appeal is stood over generally.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT NAIROBI CORAM: TUNOI, OWUOR & KEIWUA, JJ.A
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 119 OF 1999
ROSEMARY MWINGA …................................................................. APPELLANT
AND
GODFREY MAHINDA MUGURE MAHINDA................................RESPONDENTS
(Appeal from the Judgment & Decree of the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru (Rimita J) dated 22nd January, 1996
in
H.C.C NO. 237 OF 1994) *************
ORDER OF THE COURT
The appellant has not been served. The appeal is stood over generally.
Dated at Nakuru this 27th day of September, 2001.
P. K. TUNOI ....................... JUDGE OF APPEAL
E. OWUOR ........................ JUDGE OF APPEAL
OLE KEIWUA ......................... JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original DEPUTY REGISTRAR