[2021] KEEAT 298 (KLR)

[2021] KEEAT 298 (KLR)

The tribunal found that the tenant had not paid rent from January 2018 except for a single payment, and there was no order staying the landlord's right to recover rent. The landlord was therefore entitled to levy distress for rent arrears. The tenant failed to meet the threshold for a temporary injunction, as she...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEEAT 298 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ross Jay Salon (Silpher Adero); Respondent: Gatatha Farmers Company Limited; Respondent: Nyalunga Traders
Court
Education Appeals Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 654 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Applications
Outcome
Applications for temporary injunction and related reliefs dismissed; partial relief granted for utility installation; costs awarded to landlord.
Legal Topics
Landlord Tenant Disputes, Distress for Rent, Injunctive Relief, Rent Arrears, Contempt of Court, Utility Installation
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Landlord Tenant Disputes Distress for Rent Injunctive Relief Rent Arrears Contempt of Court Utility Installation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ross Jay Salon (Silpher Adero)

Applicant

Gatatha Farmers Company Limited

Respondent

Nyalunga Traders

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Applications

  1. 1 Whether the tenant is entitled to temporary injunction restraining the landlord from levying distress, eviction, or interference with the premises.
  2. 2 Whether the landlord was entitled to levy distress for rent arrears in the absence of rent reassessment or stay order.
  3. 3 Whether the tenant is entitled to install her own water and electricity meters at the premises.

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the tenant had not paid rent from January 2018 except for a single payment, and there was no order staying the landlord's right to recover rent. The landlord was therefore entitled to levy distress for rent arrears. The tenant failed to meet the threshold for a temporary injunction, as she was in substantial arrears and did not come to court with clean hands. There was no evidence that the landlord had unlawfully closed the premises or otherwise interfered with the tenant's business beyond lawful distress. The tribunal allowed the tenant to install her own water and electricity meters at her own cost, as this was unopposed. The error in the landlord's name was...

Court Disposition

Applications for temporary injunction and related reliefs dismissed; partial relief granted for utility installation; costs awarded to landlord.

Orders

  • Prayers for temporary injunction in the applications dated 3rd July 2020, 11th June 2020 and 5th July 2021 are dismissed.
  • The auctioneer shall file his/her bill of costs in this Tribunal for assessment.