[2025] KECA 385 (KLR)
The Court found that the applicant had provided a satisfactory explanation for the delay, namely, the late supply of trial proceedings. The respondent did not oppose the application and acknowledged the lengthy sentence imposed. Considering the period of delay, the reasons advanced, and the respondent's position,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KECA 385 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Isaiah Kipkorir Rotich; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Application E239 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Application / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- Application allowed.
- Judges
- PM Gachoka
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Murder Conviction, Sentencing, Court of Appeal Rules
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Isaiah Kipkorir Rotich
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient reason for delay in filing the appeal out of time.
- 2 Whether the Court should exercise its discretion under rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules to grant leave to appeal out of time.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the applicant had provided a satisfactory explanation for the delay, namely, the late supply of trial proceedings. The respondent did not oppose the application and acknowledged the lengthy sentence imposed. Considering the period of delay, the reasons advanced, and the respondent's position, the Court was satisfied that the threshold for exercising its discretion under rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules 2022 had been met. The Court therefore granted leave to the applicant to file the notice of appeal out of time, with specific timelines for filing and serving the record of appeal.
Court Disposition
Application allowed.
Orders
- The applicant shall file his notice of appeal within 14 days from the date of this order.
- The record of appeal shall be filed and served within 45 days thereafter.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
Rotich v Republic (Criminal Application E239 of 2024) [2025] KECA 385 (KLR) (28 February 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KECA 385 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Court of Appeal at Nakuru
Criminal Application E239 of 2024
PM Gachoka, JA
February 28, 2025
Between
Isaiah Kipkorir Rotich
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
(An application for leave to appeal out of time against the conviction and sentence of the High Court of Kenya at Narok (Gikonyo, J.) delivered on 13th February 2023 in HCCRC No. 11 of 2019)
Ruling
1. The Notice of Motion before me for determination is dated 21st November 2024. The applicant seeks the leave of this Court to appeal out of time from the conviction and sentence of the Narok High Court in HCCRC No. 11 of 2019. The applicant was charged with the offence of murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code. The trial court (Gikonyo, J.) convicted him of the offence and sentenced him to 30 years’ imprisonment.
2. The applicant is dissatisfied with those findings. He annexed a notice of appeal and a memorandum of appeal both dated 21st November 2024 in support of the application. He urged this Court to allow his application for the reason that he was not supplied with the proceedings at trial in good time.
3. In the respondent’s written submissions dated 3rd January 2025, Senior Assistant Director of Public Prosecutions Mr. Omutelema acting for the state did not oppose the application. He urged this Court to take into account the fact that the sentence meted out against the applicant was lengthy.
4. The discretion set out in rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules 2022 is wide and not exhaustive. However, in exercise of the same, a fact finder should not be guided by whims, caprice or sympathy.
5. I have considered the reason advanced by the applicant, the period of delay, the respondent’s submissions and the law. I am satisfied that the application has met the threshold for the exercise of discretion by this Court. Consequently, the applicant shall file his notice of appeal within 14 days from the date of this order. Thereafter, the record of appeal shall be filed and served within 45 days.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAKURU THIS 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025. M. GACHOKA C.Arb, FCIArb...................JUDGE OF APPEALI certify that this is a True copy of the originalSignedDEPUTY REGISTRAR