[2019] KEELC 2662 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 2662 (KLR)

The court found that the application for change of advocates was merited and granted leave for the new advocates to come on record for the 1st defendant. However, the prayer for stay of execution was declined at the ex parte stage and deferred for inter partes hearing. The court did not make a determination on the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 2662 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Royford Riungu Kuura; Plaintiff: Washngton Kirimi Kuura; Plaintiff: Charles Nyaga Kuura; Defendant: M. Kuura M’riria; Defendant: Tura Karinguri; Defendant: Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 112 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Review and Stay of Execution
Outcome
Partial grant of application at ex parte stage; change of advocates allowed, stay of execution declined pending inter partes hearing.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Review of Judgment, Stay of Execution, Right to Be Heard, Mistake of Counsel
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Review of Judgment Stay of Execution Right to Be Heard Mistake of Counsel

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Royford Riungu Kuura

Plaintiff

Washngton Kirimi Kuura

Plaintiff

Charles Nyaga Kuura

Plaintiff

M. Kuura M’riria

Defendant

Tura Karinguri

Defendant

Attorney General

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Review and Stay of Execution

  1. 1 Whether the 1st defendant should be allowed a change of advocates after judgment.
  2. 2 Whether there is sufficient ground for stay of execution of the judgment and decree.
  3. 3 Whether the judgment should be reviewed or set aside due to error apparent on the face of the record and alleged denial of the right to be heard.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for change of advocates was merited and granted leave for the new advocates to come on record for the 1st defendant. However, the prayer for stay of execution was declined at the ex parte stage and deferred for inter partes hearing. The court did not make a determination on the substantive prayers for review or setting aside the judgment, holding that these would be canvassed at the inter partes hearing. The ruling was limited to procedural matters and did not address the merits of the underlying application for review or stay.

Court Disposition

Partial grant of application at ex parte stage; change of advocates allowed, stay of execution declined pending inter partes hearing.

Orders

  • The law firm of M/S Thuranira Atheru & Co. Advocates is allowed to come on record for the 1st defendant in place of M/S Kiautha Arithi & Co. Advocates.
  • Prayer for stay of execution declined at ex parte stage; to be heard inter partes.